The repository administrator has not yet configured an RDF license.
ANALISIS PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM DALAM PENJATUHAN SANKSI PIDANA TERHADAP ANAK SEBAGAI PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA PEMBUNUHAN BERENCANA (STUDI KASUS PUTUSAN NOMOR 12/Pid.Sus-Anak/2022/PN Mkd)
Crime is rampant with the involvement of minors. Crimes committed by children are different from cases committed by adults. Law Number 11 of 2012 concerning the Child Criminal Justice System (UU SPPA) substantially regulates the process of solving cases for children who are facing the law (ABH). The imposition of criminal sanctions in the form of imprisonment involving minors is something that must be considered well by the judge. In every decision issued by the judge, there must be three essential things, namely justice, certainty and benefit. This study uses a case study of Decision Number 12/Pid.Sus-Anak/2022/PN Mkd with a case of premeditated murder committed by a Legal-Facing Child (ABH). The judge imposed eight (eight) years of imprisonment on Anak. This study aims to see if the decision has met the principles of justice, certainty and benefit. The purpose of this research is to find out whether the decision Number 12/Pid.Sus-Anak/2022/PN Mkd has fulfilled the sense of justice, legal certainty and benefit in society. This study uses a type of library research, which is a written data collection method using sources from Decree Number 12/Pid.Sus-Anak/PN Mkd, books, journals, and other data related to the research. This study is descriptive analytical with a juridical normative approach. Data obtained from research subjects using library study methods and interviews. Research results show that Decision Number 12/Pid.Sus-Anak/2022/PN Mkd has fulfilled the principles of justice, certainty and legal benefit for Children of criminal acts analyzed using the theory of legal purpose, This can be seen from the age and psychological conditions of children as well as the principles of development in the SPPA Law and the decisions that have been in accordance with the applicable legal provisions. However, judging from the victim's side, the principle of justice and legal benefit has not been fully fulfilled. The maximum sentence drop and the absence of an apology from the perpetrator's family caused dissatisfaction with the victim's family. In addition, family compensation does not have binding legal powers and has not guaranteed a complete restoration of rights. It is necessary to strengthen the child criminal justice system so that legal protection can be balanced against both parties.
FAKULTAS SYARIAH DAN HUKUM, UIN SUNAN KALIJAGA YOGYAKARTA
ANALISIS PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM DALAM PENJATUHAN SANKSI PIDANA TERHADAP ANAK SEBAGAI PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA PEMBUNUHAN BERENCANA (STUDI KASUS PUTUSAN NOMOR 12/Pid.Sus-Anak/2022/PN Mkd) (Text)
ANALISIS PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM DALAM PENJATUHAN SANKSI PIDANA TERHADAP ANAK SEBAGAI PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA PEMBUNUHAN BERENCANA (STUDI KASUS PUTUSAN NOMOR 12/Pid.Sus-Anak/2022/PN Mkd) (Other)
HTML Summary of #73008 ANALISIS PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM DALAM PENJATUHAN SANKSI PIDANA TERHADAP ANAK SEBAGAI PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA PEMBUNUHAN BERENCANA (STUDI KASUS PUTUSAN NOMOR 12/Pid.Sus-Anak/2022/PN Mkd)