%0 Thesis
%9 Skripsi
%A Ahmad Fachrur Rozi, NIM.: 20103060003
%B FAKULTAS SYARIAH DAN HUKUM
%D 2025
%F digilib:73011
%I UIN SUNAN KALIJAGA YOGYAKARTA
%K Driver Ojek Online, Ikhtilaf, Hukum Islam, KH. Yahya Zainul Ma’arif, KH. Abdul Somad Batubara
%P 114
%T DRIVER OJEK ONLINE MUSLIM MENGANTAR MAKANAN HARAM (STUDI PERBANDINGAN PENDAPAT KH. YAHYA ZAINUL MA’ARIF DAN KH. ABDUL SOMAD BATUBARA DI MEDIA ONLINE)
%U https://digilib.uin-suka.ac.id/id/eprint/73011/
%X The phenomenon of increasing orders for non-halal food through digital platforms such as Go-Food has created a dilemma for Muslim online motorcycle taxi drivers. Often, they have no option to refuse orders containing pork or alcoholic beverages and are even required to purchase the items in advance using their own money before delivering them to customers. This issue has sparked differing opinions among contemporary Islamic scholars, particularly between KH. Yahya Zainul Ma’arif and KH. Abdul Somad Batubara. This study aims to analyze the differing perspectives between KH. Yahya Zainul Ma’arif and KH. Abdul Somad Batubara regarding the Islamic ruling on Muslim drivers delivering non-halal food, as well as the underlying basis of their differences.  This research employs a qualitative approach using descriptive-analytical methods and the uṣūl al-fiqh framework, particularly the theory of ikhtilāf (jurisprudential disagreement). Data were obtained through literature studies of primary and secondary sources, including lectures, fatwas, and writings of both scholars. The analysis focuses on their legal reasoning and the background factors influencing their differing opinions.  The findings indicate that KH. Yahya Zainul Ma’arif permits the delivery of non-halal food in certain contexts, especially when the food belongs to a non-Muslim or when the driver is unaware of its contents. His reasoning is based on public interest (maṣlaḥah) and a contextual interpretation of general Islamic legal principles. Conversely, KH. Abdul Somad prohibits the practice, viewing it as a shubhat (doubtful matter) and potentially part of assisting in sinful acts. These differing opinions reflect the natural dynamics of ijtihād in Islam, influenced by variations in legal evidence, methods of legal derivation, and social context. Thus, the difference is not an absolute contradiction but demonstrates the flexibility of Islamic law in addressing contemporary issues.
%Z Fuad Mustafid, M.Ag.