TY  - THES
N1  - Fuad Mustafid, M.Ag.
ID  - digilib73011
UR  - https://digilib.uin-suka.ac.id/id/eprint/73011/
A1  - Ahmad Fachrur Rozi, NIM.: 20103060003
Y1  - 2025/08/15/
N2  - The phenomenon of increasing orders for non-halal food through digital platforms such as Go-Food has created a dilemma for Muslim online motorcycle taxi drivers. Often, they have no option to refuse orders containing pork or alcoholic beverages and are even required to purchase the items in advance using their own money before delivering them to customers. This issue has sparked differing opinions among contemporary Islamic scholars, particularly between KH. Yahya Zainul Ma?arif and KH. Abdul Somad Batubara. This study aims to analyze the differing perspectives between KH. Yahya Zainul Ma?arif and KH. Abdul Somad Batubara regarding the Islamic ruling on Muslim drivers delivering non-halal food, as well as the underlying basis of their differences.
This research employs a qualitative approach using descriptive-analytical methods and the u??l al-fiqh framework, particularly the theory of ikhtil?f (jurisprudential disagreement). Data were obtained through literature studies of primary and secondary sources, including lectures, fatwas, and writings of both scholars. The analysis focuses on their legal reasoning and the background factors influencing their differing opinions.
The findings indicate that KH. Yahya Zainul Ma?arif permits the delivery of non-halal food in certain contexts, especially when the food belongs to a non-Muslim or when the driver is unaware of its contents. His reasoning is based on public interest (ma?la?ah) and a contextual interpretation of general Islamic legal principles. Conversely, KH. Abdul Somad prohibits the practice, viewing it as a shubhat (doubtful matter) and potentially part of assisting in sinful acts. These differing opinions reflect the natural dynamics of ijtih?d in Islam, influenced by variations in legal evidence, methods of legal derivation, and social context. Thus, the difference is not an absolute contradiction but demonstrates the flexibility of Islamic law in addressing contemporary issues.
PB  - UIN SUNAN KALIJAGA YOGYAKARTA
KW  - Driver Ojek Online
KW  -  Ikhtilaf
KW  -  Hukum Islam
KW  -  KH. Yahya Zainul Ma?arif
KW  -  KH. Abdul Somad Batubara
M1  - skripsi
TI  - DRIVER OJEK ONLINE MUSLIM MENGANTAR MAKANAN HARAM (STUDI PERBANDINGAN PENDAPAT KH. YAHYA ZAINUL MA?ARIF DAN KH. ABDUL SOMAD BATUBARA DI MEDIA ONLINE)
AV  - restricted
EP  - 114
ER  -