@phdthesis{digilib73014,
           month = {August},
           title = {ANALISIS MASLAHAH PADA METODE STUNNING (STUDI PERBANDINGAN PEMIKIRAN YUSUF AL-QARDHAWI DAN SALIH BIN FAUZAN)},
          school = {UIN SUNAN KALIJAGA YOGYAKARTA},
          author = {NIM.: 20103060063 Husain},
            year = {2025},
            note = {Shohibul Adhkar, M.H.},
        keywords = {Maslahah, Stunning, Penyembelihan, Yusuf al-Qardawi, Shalih bin
Fauzan},
             url = {https://digilib.uin-suka.ac.id/id/eprint/73014/},
        abstract = {Indonesia, as a country with a Muslim-majority population, has strict regulations
regarding the halal status of food, particularly in the slaughtering of animals.
Islam stipulates that animals may be consumed as halal if they are slaughtered in
accordance with Sharia, namely by severing the hulqum and mari?, reciting the
basmalah, and treating the animal in a good manner without causing unnecessary
suffering. With the advancement of time, slaughtering methods have evolved with
the introduction of modern technology, one of which is stunning{--}rendering animals
unconscious using an electric current before slaughter. This method is considered
more efficient and capable of reducing pain and stress in animals, yet it has
sparked differing views among contemporary scholars. Among those who have addressed
this issue are Yusuf al-Qaradawi, who permits slaughter using the stunning
method under certain conditions, and Shalih bin Fauzan, who rejects it on the
grounds that it contradicts Sharia principles.
This thesis employs library research, which focuses on comparing the opinions
of Yusuf al-Qaradawi and Shalih bin Fauzan. The research is based on a literature
study of primary and secondary works from both scholars. The theoretical
framework used is the concept of maslahah{--}a principle of public interest that does
not have an explicit textual basis but is recognized for its relevance in Islamic law
as long as it does not contradict the Qur?an, Sunnah, and maqasid al-shariah. The
analysis focuses on how Yusuf al-Qaradawi and Shalih bin Fauzan weigh the aspects
of benefit (ma{\d s}la{\d h}ah) and harm (mafsadah) in the use of the stunning method.
Based on the study conducted, this research shows that Yusuf al-Qaradawi
tends to be contextual and flexible, emphasizing practical benefits for modern society,
while Shalih bin Fauzan adopts a textual and cautious approach, prioritizing
vigilance to avoid violating Sharia rulings. These differences stem from variations
in their methods of legal reasoning (istinbat al-hukm) and their respective sociocultural
backgrounds. This study affirms that the maslahah theory can serve as an
important analytical tool in understanding and assessing contemporary issues, particularly
regarding the lawfulness of animal slaughter using the stunning method.}
}