%0 Thesis
%9 Skripsi
%A Shania Athira Azra, NIM.: 19103040089
%B FAKULTAS SYARI’AH DAN HUKUM
%D 2025
%F digilib:74211
%I UIN SUNAN KALIJAGA YOGYAKARTA
%K Delik Culpa, Pertimbangan Hakim, Proporsionalitas Pemidanaan
%P 138
%T ANALISIS PROPORSIONALITAS PEMIDANAAN TERHADAP PELAKU DELIK CULPA DALAM PERKARA TINDAK PIDANA KEALPAAN YANG MENGAKIBATKAN KORBAN MENINGGAL DUNIA  (STUDI PUTUSAN PENGADILAN NEGERI CIAMIS NOMOR 188/PID.B/2022/PN CMS)
%U https://digilib.uin-suka.ac.id/id/eprint/74211/
%X Criminal act can be described as unlawful act did by a person either dolus (intentionally) or culpa (un-intentionally) which is referred as an action that can be punished by the law. Deciding a criminal case should contain legal justice, legal certainty and legal benefits, those can be assessed from the legal considerations. Judge’s consideration must arranged proportionally, based on seriousness level of the criminal act whis has been done by the defendant. One of those cases by criminal acts due to culpa delict which results the death of another person is a case in Ciamis District Court Verdict Number 188/Pid.B/PN.Cms. From this problem, rise some question: First, What are the legal considerations developed by the judge viewed by criminal law proporsionality theory in Ciamis District Court Verdict Number 188/Pid.B/PN.Cms? and Second, How is the application of criminal law proporsionality theory in imposing a sentence on a criminal case of negligent that results on victim’s death in Ciamis District Court Verdict Number 188/Pid.B/PN.Cms?  To answer those problems, this research used a juridis-empirical approach with documentation data and literature collection methods related to punishment proporsionality and culpa delict. All of the collected data then analyzed and described qualitatively.  The results of this research show that the judges has considered the juridical and non-juridical aspect for the law consideration of Ciamis District Court Verdict Number 188/Pid.B/2022/PN.Cms, but the judges assessed not considering enough the impact of the victim and public as the result of that criminal act. The low criminal punishment did not reflecting the high impact that the defendant has made. Ciamis District Court Verdict Number 188/Pid.B/PN.Cms assessed not proporsional yet, because the criminal punishment as 2 (two) years and 6 (six) months or a half of the indictment that has been given by the prosecutor considered not balanced with the level seriousness of the criminal act that has been done by the defendant.
%Z Bustanul Arifien Rusydi, M.H.