@phdthesis{digilib74754, month = {November}, title = {HUBUNGAN ADVERSITY QUOTIENT DAN SERVANT LEADERSHIP TERHADAP KECEMASAN KERJA KARYAWAN DI PT. X KALIMANTAN TIMUR}, school = {UIN SUNAN KALIJAGA YOGYAKARTA}, author = {NIM.: 21107010024 Choirunisa Nor Hanifah}, year = {2025}, note = {Dr. Benny Herlena, S. Psi., M. Si.}, keywords = {Adversity Quotient, Karyawan, Kecemasan Kerja, Servant Leadership}, url = {https://digilib.uin-suka.ac.id/id/eprint/74754/}, abstract = {Job anxiety has become a concerning phenomenon in the modern workplace, particularly within high-risk industries such as mining. Various preventive measures have been implemented to address and mitigate job anxiety, ranging from emotional management training and counseling services to routine recreational activities; however, a significant number of employees continue to experience noteworthy levels of anxiety. Consequently, this study aims to investigate the relationship between adversity quotient and servant leadership on job anxiety among employees at PT. X in East Kalimantan. This study employed a quantitative correlational method involving 105 respondents selected using a quota sampling technique. Data collection utilized questionnaires consisting of the Job Anxiety Scale, Adversity Quotient Scale, and Servant Leadership Scale. The data analysis technique used was multiple linear regression assisted by Jamovi software. The results indicated that adversity quotient has a significant negative relationship with job anxiety. Conversely, servant leadership did not demonstrate a significant relationship with job anxiety. Simultaneously, both variables were proven to contribute effectively by 28.8\% to job anxiety. The implications of this study suggest a need to evaluate human resource management approaches to prioritize the strengthening of individual internal resilience rather than relying merely on leadership styles. Furthermore, to mitigate employee job anxiety, it is recommended that PT. X East Kalimantan focus interventions on resilience and emotional management training, as well as consider alternative leadership styles more relevant to field conditions, such as safety leadership.} }