<> "The repository administrator has not yet configured an RDF license."^^ . <> . . . "PERBEDAAN PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM DALAM PUTUSAN WANPRESTASI STUDI KASUS PENGADILAN AGAMA BANTUL DAN PENGADILAN TINGGI AGAMA YOGYAKARTA"^^ . "This research is a comparative and critical case study analyzing the disparity in\r\nrulings concerning Ijrāh Multijāsa financing default disputes between the Bantul\r\nReligious Court (No. 1171/Pdt.G/2023/PA.Btl) and the Yogyakarta High Religious\r\nCourt (No. 1/Pdt.G/2024/PTA.Yk). The study aims to answer three core questions:\r\n(1) Why are there different legal interpretation paradigms in the two rulings? (2)\r\nHow adequate and successful are the paradigms applied by the courts in realizing\r\nthe principles of Maqāṣid Syarī‘ah? (3) What are the juridical implications of these\r\ndifferences on legal certainty (rechtszekerheid) and jurisprudential consistency?\r\nThe research employs a comparative juridical-normative method, analyzed through\r\nSudikno Mertokusumo's Legal Interpretation Theory (for classifying rechtsvinding)\r\nand Jasser Auda's Systemic Maqāṣid Syarī‘ah Theory (for philosophical\r\nevaluation).\r\nThe primary findings indicate that the difference in rulings stems from\r\ncontrasting methodological interpretations. The first-tier judges (Bantul Religious\r\nCourt) tend to use a legalistic-formal approach, prioritizing Grammatical\r\nInterpretation and strictly adhering to contract texts and non-comprehensive\r\npositive regulations, leading to the explicit rejection of monetary sanctions (ta‘zīr).\r\nConversely, the appellate judges (Yogyakarta High Religious Court) employ a more\r\nprogressive teleological-sociological approach, integrating maqāṣid syarī‘ah into\r\ntheir interpretation to balance the protection of Sharia capital (Ḥifẓ al-Māl) with\r\nsubstantive justice (al-‘Adl), resulting in the affirmation of collateral execution and\r\nthe justification of ta‘zīr sanctions in line with DSN-MUI Fatwas. A critical\r\nevaluation using Jasser Auda’s framework concludes that the Yogyakarta High\r\nReligious Court’s ruling is more shahih (valid) and purposeful. This ruling\r\nsuccessfully fulfills Auda's principles of Wholeness and Multi-dimensionality by\r\nviewing the objectives of Sharia law systematically, whereas the formalistic\r\napproach of the Bantul Religious Court is deemed partial and potentially weakens\r\nḤifẓ al-Māl for the Islamic Financial Institutions as creditors.\r\nThe juridical implications of this contestation in interpretative paradigms\r\nare highly significant, leading to the erosion of legal certainty (rechtszekerheid)\r\nand jurisprudential inconsistency within the Religious Court system. This research\r\nunderscores the necessity for the standardization of legal interpretation\r\nmethodology among religious court judges. It is recommended that the Supreme\r\nCourt (MA) provide structured guidelines and training emphasizing the consistent\r\nintegration of Modern Legal Interpretation Theory and Jasser Auda’s Maqāṣid\r\nSyarī‘ah Philosophy to ensure that judicial rulings are not only formally sound but\r\nalso substantively just, thereby supporting the development of a healthy and\r\nsustainable Sharia economic ecosystem in Indonesia."^^ . "2025-12-05" . . . . "UIN SUNAN KALIJAGA YOGYAKARTA"^^ . . . "FAKULTAS SYARI’AH DAN HUKUM, UIN SUNAN KALIJAGA YOGYAKARTA"^^ . . . . . . . . . "NIM.: 23203012056"^^ . "Satria, S.H."^^ . "NIM.: 23203012056 Satria, S.H."^^ . . . . . . "PERBEDAAN PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM DALAM PUTUSAN WANPRESTASI STUDI KASUS PENGADILAN AGAMA BANTUL DAN PENGADILAN TINGGI AGAMA YOGYAKARTA (Text)"^^ . . . . . "23203012056_BAB-I_IV-atau-V_DAFTAR-PUSTAKA.pdf"^^ . . . "PERBEDAAN PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM DALAM PUTUSAN WANPRESTASI STUDI KASUS PENGADILAN AGAMA BANTUL DAN PENGADILAN TINGGI AGAMA YOGYAKARTA (Text)"^^ . . . . . "PERBEDAAN PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM DALAM PUTUSAN WANPRESTASI STUDI KASUS PENGADILAN AGAMA BANTUL DAN PENGADILAN TINGGI AGAMA YOGYAKARTA (Other)"^^ . . . . . . "lightbox.jpg"^^ . . . "PERBEDAAN PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM DALAM PUTUSAN WANPRESTASI STUDI KASUS PENGADILAN AGAMA BANTUL DAN PENGADILAN TINGGI AGAMA YOGYAKARTA (Other)"^^ . . . . . . "preview.jpg"^^ . . . "PERBEDAAN PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM DALAM PUTUSAN WANPRESTASI STUDI KASUS PENGADILAN AGAMA BANTUL DAN PENGADILAN TINGGI AGAMA YOGYAKARTA (Other)"^^ . . . . . . "medium.jpg"^^ . . . "PERBEDAAN PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM DALAM PUTUSAN WANPRESTASI STUDI KASUS PENGADILAN AGAMA BANTUL DAN PENGADILAN TINGGI AGAMA YOGYAKARTA (Other)"^^ . . . . . . "small.jpg"^^ . . . "PERBEDAAN PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM DALAM PUTUSAN WANPRESTASI STUDI KASUS PENGADILAN AGAMA BANTUL DAN PENGADILAN TINGGI AGAMA YOGYAKARTA (Other)"^^ . . . . . . "PERBEDAAN PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM DALAM PUTUSAN WANPRESTASI STUDI KASUS PENGADILAN AGAMA BANTUL DAN PENGADILAN TINGGI AGAMA YOGYAKARTA (Other)"^^ . . . . . . "PERBEDAAN PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM DALAM PUTUSAN WANPRESTASI STUDI KASUS PENGADILAN AGAMA BANTUL DAN PENGADILAN TINGGI AGAMA YOGYAKARTA (Other)"^^ . . . . . . "PERBEDAAN PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM DALAM PUTUSAN WANPRESTASI STUDI KASUS PENGADILAN AGAMA BANTUL DAN PENGADILAN TINGGI AGAMA YOGYAKARTA (Other)"^^ . . . . . "HTML Summary of #74927 \n\nPERBEDAAN PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM DALAM PUTUSAN WANPRESTASI STUDI KASUS PENGADILAN AGAMA BANTUL DAN PENGADILAN TINGGI AGAMA YOGYAKARTA\n\n" . "text/html" . . . "347.07 Keputusan Hakim" . .