%0 Thesis
%9 Skripsi
%A Moh Royyan Albab, NIM.: 21105050074
%B FAKULTAS USHULUDDIN DAN PEMIKIRAN ISLAM
%D 2025
%F digilib:74961
%I UIN SUNAN KALIJAGA YOGYAKARTA
%K Al-Jawahir Al-Lu’lu’iyyah, Syarh Al-Arba‘in An-Nawawiyyah, Metode Tahlili, Syarah Hadis, Muhammad bin Abdillah Al-Dimasyqi
%P 114
%T METODOLOGI SYARAH KITAB ARBAIN NAWAWI (STUDI KITAB AL-JAWAHIR AL-LU’LUIYYAH KARYA MUHAMMAD BIN ABDILLAH AL-DIMASYQI)
%U https://digilib.uin-suka.ac.id/id/eprint/74961/
%X The book Al-Jawāhir Al-Lu’lū’iyyah fī Syarḥ Al-Arba‘īn An-Nawawiyyah is one of the  commentaries on Al-Arba‘īn An-Nawawiyyah written by Shaykh Muhammad bin Abdillah Al-  Dimasyqi. This book occupies an important position among many works of ḥadīth commentary  as it presents extensive discussions involving various branches of knowledge such as  linguistics, history, law, and ḥadīth studies. However, to date, no research has specifically  examined the methodology, approach, and distinctive characteristics of this work. Therefore,  this study aims to analyze the methods and approaches of ḥadīth commentary employed by  Shaykh Muhammad bin Abdillah Al-Dimasyqi and to identify the distinct features, strengths,  weaknesses, and contributions of the book to the field of ḥadīth commentary.  This research is a qualitative library study using a descriptive-analytical method. The  primary data were obtained from the book Al-Jawāhir Al-Lu’lū’iyyah fī Syarḥ Al-Arba‘īn An-  Nawawiyyah by Shaykh Muhammad bin Abdillah Al-Dimasyqi, both from its Arabic version  published by Maktabah Al-Iman (Egypt) and its Indonesian translation. Secondary data were  collected from other ḥadīth works, commentaries, books, articles, and relevant scholarly  literature. Data were gathered through documentation and in-depth reading of the text, and  analyzed using a descriptive analytical technique.  The results of the study show that the commentary method used by Shaykh Muhammad  bin Abdillah Al-Dimasyqi in Al-Jawāhir Al-Lu’lū’iyyah is the tahlili method, employing  linguistic, historical, legal, and naqli approaches. This book is characterized by its systematic  structure, comprehensive information on mukharrij, the inclusion of Dabth Al-Khafiy min Al-  Alfazh li Al-Imam An-Nawawi, and the section Al-Durus Al-Mustafād min Al-Hadith. Its  strengths include providing titles for each ḥadīth, complete biographies of narrators, detailed  explanations of mukharrij, and deep analytical discussions. However, its weaknesses lie in the  absence of ḥadīth authentication (takhrij), the lack of the author’s biography, and excessively  lengthy and complex explanations that may challenge general readers. Overall, this book makes  a significant contribution to enriching the literature of ḥadīth commentary and developing a  multidisciplinary approach in contemporary ḥadīth studies.
%Z Asrul, M.Hum.