TY  - THES
N1  - Prof. Dr. Muhammad Chirzin M. Ag.
ID  - digilib74975
UR  - https://digilib.uin-suka.ac.id/id/eprint/74975/
A1  - Ade Silviana Wulandari, NIM.: 22105030068
Y1  - 2025/11/28/
N2  - Tikr?r is one of the rhetorical arts within the discipline of balaghah, referring
to the phenomenon of repetition in the Qur?an. This subject has attracted the
attention of scholars since the classical period, among them Ma?m?d ibn ?amzah
ibn Na?r al-Kirm?n?, author of Asr?r al-Takr?r f? al-Qur??n. In this work, al-
Kirm?n? discusses forms of lexical repetition (Tikr?r laf??) in the Qur?an. However,
several verses whose wording appears to be repeated are not addressed in his
study?for example, those found in Surah al-Baqarah: verses 47, 122, 134, 141,
149, 150, and 286. The purpose of this research is to examine the interpretation of
these verses in Tafs?r al-Qad?r and Tafs?r al-Mishb?h, and to compare the
interpretations of both works.
This study employs a qualitative library research method using a
descriptive-analytical approach to examine how Tafs?r al-Qad?r and Tafs?r al-
Mishb?h interpret Tikr?r in Surah al-Baqarah, as well as a descriptive-comparative
approach to contrast both interpretations. The primary sources include Tafs?r al-
Qad?r by al-Shawk?n? and Tafs?r al-Mishb?h by M. Quraish Shihab, accompanied
by other relevant literature on Tikr?r. The analysis begins by identifying repeated
verses in Surah al-Baqarah, followed by examining their interpretations in both
tafsirs, and finally comparing the perspectives of the two works.
The findings of this study show that Tafs?r al-Qad?r and Tafs?r al-Mishb?h
interpret Tikr?r within contextual frames that differ from the verses preceding them.
Both sources understand Tikr?r as a means of reinforcing meaning, recalling past
events, magnifying certain themes, and refuting those who deny the truth. In
interpreting Tikr?r, Tafs?r al-Qad?r tends to emphasize textual proximity, semantic
coherence, and classical Arabic linguistic conventions to uncover the underlying
rhetorical functions. Meanwhile, Tafs?r al-Mishb?h relates tikr?r to deeper semantic
and emotional dimensions in order to construct inter-ayat correlations. The
comparison of both tafsirs demonstrates the richness of Tikr?r?s functions: it does
not merely serve as an element of emphasis, but also as a form of Qur?anic
pedagogy, a mode of magnification through repeated mention, and a source of
guidance when one faces uncertainty.
PB  - UIN SUNAN KALIJAGA YOGYAKARTA
KW  - Tikrar
KW  -  Al-Baqarah
KW  -  Tafsir Al-Qadir
KW  -  Tafsir Al-Misbah
M1  - skripsi
TI  - PERBANDINGAN TAFSIR AL-QADIR DAN AL-MISBAH TENTANG TIKRAR DALAM SURAT AL-BAQARAH
AV  - restricted
EP  - 107
ER  -