@phdthesis{digilib75484,
           month = {December},
           title = {HUKUM QURBAN SEMBELIHAN AHLI KITAB (STUDI KOMPARATIF PEMIKIRAN WAHBAH ZUHAILI DAN QURAISH SHIHAB)},
          school = {UIN SUNAN KALIJAGA YOGYAKARTA},
          author = {NIM.: 19103060076 Muhammad Malik Ibni Rizal},
            year = {2025},
            note = {Nurdhin Baroroh, S.H.I., M.S.I.},
        keywords = {Qurban, Ahli Kitab, Qiyas, Wahbah Az-Zuhaili, Quraish Shihab},
             url = {https://digilib.uin-suka.ac.id/id/eprint/75484/},
        abstract = {This thesis examines the debated validity of ritual sacrifice (qurban/u{\d d}{\d h}iyah) when the slaughter is carried out by People of the Book (Ahl al-Kit{\=a}b) in a plural society. The issue arises because Q. 5:5 permits the food ({\d t}a?{\=a}m) of Ahl al-Kit{\=a}b, while qurban is a devotional rite bound by specific requirements and the intention of drawing nearer to Allah. The study addresses two questions: (1) how Wahbah az-Zu{\d h}ail{\=i} and M. Quraish Shihab judge Ahl al-Kit{\=a}b slaughter and its implications for qurban; and (2) how Qiy{\=a}s may be applied to the case of Ahl al-Kit{\=a}b slaughtering an animal intended for qurban.
The research is library-based, descriptive-analytical, and comparative. Primary data are drawn from the works of Wahbah az-Zu{\d h}ail{\=i} and M. Quraish Shihab, supported by fiqh and u{\d s}{\=u}l al-fiqh literature. Qiy{\=a}s serves as the analytical framework by mapping its pillars (al-a{\d s}l, al-far?, {\d h}ukm al-a{\d s}l, and ?illah) to reconstruct each author?s method of legal reasoning.
The findings show that both scholars refer to Q. 5:5 as the main textual basis and emphasize a strict monotheistic orientation: slaughter must not be devoted to other than Allah and must not involve invoking a name other than Allah. Wahbah az-Zu{\d h}ail{\=i} tends to present a more explicit juristic formulation and notes juristic disagreement regarding who may slaughter a qurban animal, including views requiring a Muslim slaughterer and views allowing Ahl al-Kit{\=a}b to slaughter through delegated agency (wak{\=a}lah) provided that the conditions of lawful slaughter (ta{\.z}kiyah) are met. Quraish Shihab highlights the devotional-symbolic dimension of qurban as a mansak, leading to a cautious preference for a Muslim slaughterer to avoid doubtful validity. In Qiy{\=a}s terms, the permissibility of Ahl al-Kit{\=a}b slaughter can serve as the al-a{\d s}l for the qurban case when the effective cause is lawful slaughter grounded in pure monotheism; however, if the ?illah of qurban is understood primarily as a ta?abbud{\=i} requirement that demands a Muslim performer, the analogy becomes weak and precaution should prevail.}
}