eprintid: 75500
rev_number: 11
eprint_status: archive
userid: 12460
dir: disk0/00/07/55/00
datestamp: 2026-02-10 02:56:18
lastmod: 2026-02-10 02:56:18
status_changed: 2026-02-10 02:56:18
type: thesis
metadata_visibility: show
contact_email: muh.khabib@uin-suka.ac.id
creators_name: Abdulloh, NIM.: 22103040094
title: KONSTRUKSI PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PERDATA DIREKSI BUMN PASCA PERUBAHAN KETIGA ATAS UU BUMN (ANALISIS BATASAN BUSINESS JUDGMENT RULE)
ispublished: pub
subjects: 346
divisions: il_hum
full_text_status: restricted
keywords: Business Judgment Rule, Direksi BUMN, Pertanggungjawaban Perdata,
Gustav Radbruch, UU BUMN 2025
note: Dr. Wardatul Fitri, S.H., M.H.
abstract: This research is motivated by the phenomenon of criminalization of stateowned
enterprise (BUMN) board policies due to the unclear boundaries between
business losses and state losses. The codification of the Business Judgment Rule (BJR)
doctrine in Article 9F of Law No. 1 of 2025 is intended to provide legal certainty and
protection for directors. This research aims to analyze the construction and limitations
of BJR protection in Law No. 1 of 2025 and its implications for board accountability
from the perspective of Gustav Radbruch's Theory of Legal Objectives.
The type of research used is descriptive-analytical normative legal research
with a statute approach and a conceptual approach. The theoretical framework in this
study is arranged hierarchically, covering the Grand Theory of Legal Purpose (Gustav
Radbruch), Applied Theory of Civil Liability Theory, Business Judgment Rule (BJR)
Doctrine, and Good Corporate Governance (GCG) Principles as operational evidence
instruments. Secondary data were analyzed qualitatively using legal interpretation and
deductive reasoning methods.
The results of the study show that: (1) The construction of BJR in Article 9F of
Law No. Law No. 1 of 2025 provides qualified immunity, requiring directors to meet
four cumulative requirements: absence of gross error/negligence, good faith and
prudence, absence of conflict of interest, and mitigation measures. From a Civil
Liability Theory perspective, this construct allocates business risks to the corporation
(liability as cost) as long as directors fulfill procedural moral obligations (liability as
duty). (2) The implications of the BJR codification embody the value of substantive
justice by protecting the professionalism of directors from unfair criminalization.
However, the elimination of Article 9G by Law No. 16 of 2025 creates ambivalence
regarding the status of directors as "state administrators," which perpetuates a gray
area in law enforcement. From Radbruch's perspective, the application of Good
Corporate Governance (GCG) principles serves as an "evidentiary bridge" that is
absolutely necessary to activate BJR protection in court in order to maintain a balance
between the values of justice, benefit, and legal certainty.
date: 2026-01-12
date_type: published
pages: 131
institution: UIN SUNAN KALIJAGA YOGYAKARTA
department: FAKULTAS SYARIAH DAN HUKUM
thesis_type: skripsi
thesis_name: other
citation:   Abdulloh, NIM.: 22103040094  (2026) KONSTRUKSI PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PERDATA DIREKSI BUMN PASCA PERUBAHAN KETIGA ATAS UU BUMN (ANALISIS BATASAN BUSINESS JUDGMENT RULE).  Skripsi thesis, UIN SUNAN KALIJAGA YOGYAKARTA.   
document_url: https://digilib.uin-suka.ac.id/id/eprint/75500/1/22103040094_BAB-I_IV-atau-V_DAFTAR-PUSTAKA.pdf
document_url: https://digilib.uin-suka.ac.id/id/eprint/75500/2/22103040094_BAB-II_sampai_SEBELUM-BAB-TERAKHIR.pdf