The repository administrator has not yet configured an RDF license.
IMPLIKASI HUKUM PUTUSAN NIET ONTVANKELIJKE VERKLAARD (NO) DALAM SENGKETA HAK CIPTA: STUDI KASUS LAGU NUANSA BENING PERSPEKTIF SADD AL-DZARI’AH
The development of the music industry in the digital era has increased the economic value of creative works, while simultaneously intensifying copyright infringement. Through Law Number 28 of 2014 on Copyright, the State provides legal protection for creators by recognizing moral and economic rights. However, the settlement of copyright disputes in court often fails to achieve substantive justice because claims are declared Niet Ontvankelijke Verklaard (NO) due to formal defects, preventing the examination of the merits of the case. This issue is reflected in the copyright dispute over the song “Nuansa Bening” involving Vidi Aldiano, where the NO ruling potentially delays legal protection for the creator. This situation raises questions regarding the legal implications of NO decisions in copyright disputes and their conformity with the values of public interest (maslahah) in Islamic law. This study employs normative legal research with a descriptive-analytical approach based on library research. The data consist of primary legal materials in the form of court decisions related to the copyright dispute, as well as secondary and tertiary legal materials such as statutory regulations, academic journals, books, and relevant literature. The theoretical framework applied includes copyright theory to examine the protection of creators’ moral and economic rights, and the theory of Sadd al-Dzarī’ah to analyze the legal consequences of NO decisions as a means that may hinder the realization of substantive justice. The findings indicate that the use of the song “Nuansa Bening” in performances and digital distribution is directly related to the creator’s economic rights, which should be protected by law. Nevertheless, the NO decision issued due to a formal defect in the form of lack of necessary parties caused the court to refrain from examining the substance of the dispute, thereby delaying the protection of the creator’s rights. From the perspective of Sadd al-Dzarī’ah, an NO decision that emphasizes procedural aspects may lead to mafsadah, namely the obstruction of public interest and the weakening of effective copyright law enforcement. Therefore, a judicial approach that balances procedural certainty with substantive justice and public interest is required.
FAKULTAS SYARIAH DAN HUKUM, UIN SUNAN KALIJAGA YOGYAKARTA
IMPLIKASI HUKUM PUTUSAN NIET ONTVANKELIJKE VERKLAARD (NO) DALAM SENGKETA HAK CIPTA: STUDI KASUS LAGU NUANSA BENING PERSPEKTIF SADD AL-DZARI’AH (Text)
IMPLIKASI HUKUM PUTUSAN NIET ONTVANKELIJKE VERKLAARD (NO) DALAM SENGKETA HAK CIPTA: STUDI KASUS LAGU NUANSA BENING PERSPEKTIF SADD AL-DZARI’AH (Other)
HTML Summary of #75533 IMPLIKASI HUKUM PUTUSAN NIET ONTVANKELIJKE VERKLAARD (NO) DALAM SENGKETA HAK CIPTA: STUDI KASUS LAGU NUANSA BENING PERSPEKTIF SADD AL-DZARI’AH
346.04 HAKI, Undang-undang Hak Cipta, Copy Right