The repository administrator has not yet configured an RDF license.
PROSEDUR SISTEM BERJENJANG TERHADAP EKSEKUSI PUTUSAN PENGADILAN TATA USAHA NEGARA (STUDI PERBANDINGAN PENGADILAN TATA USAHA NEGARA INDONESIA DAN THAILAND)
The enforcement of Administrative Court decisions in Indonesia faces serious obstacles, specifically the non-compliance of administrative officials. The hierarchical execution procedure is regulated under Article 116 of Law Number 51 of 2009 concerning the Administrative Court. Article 116 is considered ineffective as it relies solely on the self-awareness of officials without any coercive instruments; although there is a provision for forced fees (dwangsom), there is no regulation governing its implementation. This study aims to analyze the issues within the hierarchical execution system of the Administrative Court in Indonesia, compare it with the execution mechanism of the Administrative Court of Thailand, and review it from the perspective of maslahah mursalah. This study employs a normative juridical research method (library research), involving a series of efforts to obtain data by reading, examining, and identifying legal materials in the form of laws and regulations related to the research. This is a descriptive-analytical study using a statutory approach, a comparative approach, and a conceptual approach. The analysis aims to determine the problems of hierarchical execution in the Indonesian Administrative Court, compare the execution procedures with the Administrative Court of Thailand, and provide a maslahah mursalah review of the hierarchical procedures in the execution of Administrative Court decisions in Indonesia. The results of this study indicate that the hierarchical execution system in Indonesia fails to meet the requirements of legal certainty because court decisions cannot be executed concretely. The hierarchical procedure in the enforcement of Administrative Court decisions is inconsistent with authentic benefit (maslahah hakiki) because it provides no real advantage and fails to avert harm (mudharat). This hierarchical procedure increases the burden on seekers of justice and undermines the objectives of Sharia (maqashid syariah), namely the protection of property (hifzhu al-mal) and the protection of honor/life (hifzhu al-nafs).
FAKULTAS SYARIAH DAN HUKUM, UIN SUNAN KALIJAGA YOGYAKARTA
PROSEDUR SISTEM BERJENJANG TERHADAP EKSEKUSI PUTUSAN PENGADILAN TATA USAHA NEGARA (STUDI PERBANDINGAN PENGADILAN TATA USAHA NEGARA INDONESIA DAN THAILAND) (Text)
HTML Summary of #75907 PROSEDUR SISTEM BERJENJANG TERHADAP EKSEKUSI PUTUSAN PENGADILAN TATA USAHA NEGARA (STUDI PERBANDINGAN PENGADILAN TATA USAHA NEGARA INDONESIA DAN THAILAND)