…
comment: The repository administrator has not yet configured an RDF license.
primary topic: http://digilib.uin-suka.ac.id/id/eprint/75914

http://digilib.uin-suka.ac.id/id/eprint/75914
type: Thesis
type: Article
title: TANGGUNG JAWAB PRIBADI DIREKSI ATAS KEPAILITAN PERSEROAN TERBATAS AKIBAT KELALAIAN SUBSTANTIF DAN ADMINISTRATIF (STUDI KOMPARATIF PUTUSAN PENGADILAN NIAGA SURABAYA NO. 39/PDT.SUS-GUGATAN LAIN-LAIN/2023 DAN NO. 40/PDT.SUS-GUGATAN LAIN-LAIN/2023)
abstract: The principle of limited liability is a fundamental characteristic of a Limited Liability Company that protects the personal assets of the Board of Directors. However, this protection can be set aside through the doctrine of piercing the corporate veil if bankruptcy occurs due to the Directors' fault or negligence. This research is motivated by a legal phenomenon in two decisions of the Commercial Court at the Surabaya District Court regarding the bankruptcy of PT Alam Galaxy, namely Decision Number 39/Pdt.Sus-Gugatan Lain-Lain/2023 and Number 40/Pdt.Sus-Gugatan Lain-Lain/2023. There is a legal anomaly where the Directors were imposed with joint and several liability of equal severity for two different characteristics of negligence: substantive negligence in the form of business management errors triggering losses, and administrative negligence in the form of failure to hold the General Meeting of Shareholders (GMS) and compile the Annual Report. The main problem examined is the juridical qualification of the demarcation line between these two types of negligence and the judge's legal consideration (ratio decidendi) in equating the weight of sanctions for both. This research is normative legal research (juridical normative) which is descriptive-analytical in nature. The author uses a statute approach and a case approach to dissect the application of law in casu. The theoretical framework used as a tool of analysis includes Agency Theory to examine the aspect of information asymmetry, Fiduciary Duty Doctrine covering Duty of Care and Duty of Loyalty, as well as the Piercing the Corporate Veil Doctrine. Secondary data sourced from Law of Limited Liability Companies, Bankruptcy Law, and relevant court decisions were analyzed qualitatively using deductive logic to draw conclusions regarding the standard of personal liability of Directors. The results of the study conclude that the demarcation line between management negligence and administrative negligence becomes blurr…
date: 2026-01-30
status: published
author list: authors
type: EPrint
type: ThesisEPrint
is part of: repository
has document: http://digilib.uin-suka.ac.id/id/document/1047588
has version: http://digilib.uin-suka.ac.id/id/document/1047588
has published: http://digilib.uin-suka.ac.id/id/document/1047588
has document: http://digilib.uin-suka.ac.id/id/document/1047589
subject: 348.04 Kasus Pengadilan, Perkara Pengadilan

http://digilib.uin-suka.ac.id/id/document/1047588
type: Document
label: TANGGUNG JAWAB PRIBADI DIREKSI ATAS KEPAILITAN PERSEROAN TERBATAS AKIBAT KELALAIAN SUBSTANTIF DAN ADMINISTRATIF (STUDI KOMPARATIF PUTUSAN PENGADILAN NIAGA SURABAYA NO. 39/PDT.SUS-GUGATAN LAIN-LAIN/2023 DAN NO. 40/PDT.SUS-GUGATAN LAIN-LAIN/2023) (Text)
has file: 22103040178_BAB-I_IV-atau-V_DAFTAR-PUSTAKA.pdf
has part: 22103040178_BAB-I_IV-atau-V_DAFTAR-PUSTAKA.pdf

http://digilib.uin-suka.ac.id/id/document/1047589
type: Document
label: TANGGUNG JAWAB PRIBADI DIREKSI ATAS KEPAILITAN PERSEROAN TERBATAS AKIBAT KELALAIAN SUBSTANTIF DAN ADMINISTRATIF (STUDI KOMPARATIF PUTUSAN PENGADILAN NIAGA SURABAYA NO. 39/PDT.SUS-GUGATAN LAIN-LAIN/2023 DAN NO. 40/PDT.SUS-GUGATAN LAIN-LAIN/2023) (Text)

UIN SUNAN KALIJAGA YOGYAKARTA
type: Organization

FAKULTAS SYARIAH DAN HUKUM, UIN SUNAN KALIJAGA YOGYAKARTA
type: Organization

NIM.: 22103040178 Reza Ditya Kesuma
type: Person
given name: NIM.: 22103040178
family name: Reza Ditya Kesuma

https://digilib.uin-suka.ac.id/id/eprint/75914/
title: HTML Summary of #75914 TANGGUNG JAWAB PRIBADI DIREKSI ATAS KEPAILITAN PERSEROAN TERBATAS AKIBAT KELALAIAN SUBSTANTIF DAN ADMINISTRATIF (STUDI KOMPARATIF PUTUSAN PENGADILAN NIAGA SURABAYA NO. 39/PDT.SUS-GUGATAN LAIN-LAIN/2023 DAN NO. 40/PDT.SUS-GUGATAN LAIN-LAIN/2023)
format: text/html
primary topic: http://digilib.uin-suka.ac.id/id/eprint/75914

348.04 Kasus Pengadilan, Perkara Pengadilan
type: Concept