<mods:mods version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" xmlns:mods="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"><mods:titleInfo><mods:title>KEADILAN DALAM PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP ANAK YANG LAHIR DARI PERKAWINAN SIRI</mods:title></mods:titleInfo><mods:name type="personal"><mods:namePart type="given">NIM.: 22103040153</mods:namePart><mods:namePart type="family">Amalia Nur Hidayati</mods:namePart><mods:role><mods:roleTerm type="text">author</mods:roleTerm></mods:role></mods:name><mods:abstract>This research examines the challenges of legal protection and the fulfillment of the&#13;
principle of justice for children born from unregistered marriages in Indonesia.&#13;
Although considered theologically legitimate, the lack of marriage registration&#13;
creates legal vulnerabilities for children, particularly regarding their rights to&#13;
identity, support, and inheritance. The research problem formulation focuses on:&#13;
(1) How are legal protection norms and the manifestation of state obligations&#13;
towards children born from unregistered marriages?; and (2) How is the fulfillment&#13;
of the principle of justice for children born from unregistered marriages reviewed&#13;
from the principles of equality and freedom?&#13;
The research method used is normative juridical with library research. The research&#13;
approach includes a statute approach and a conceptual approach. Secondary data&#13;
were analyzed descriptively and analytically using John Rawls' Theory of Justice,&#13;
Legal Protection Theory, and the concept of State Order.&#13;
The results of the research indicate that: (1) Legal protection norms for&#13;
unregistered children are guaranteed in Article 28B paragraph (2) of the 1945&#13;
Constitution, the Child Protection Law, and Constitutional Court Decision No.&#13;
46/PUU-VIII/2010. However, the state, as a duty bearer, has not fully realized the&#13;
ideal State Order because administrative policies, such as the SPTJM mechanism&#13;
in Home Affairs Ministerial Regulation No. 108 of 2019, are still partial&#13;
"administrative rescue" and are not substantively synchronized with substantive&#13;
marriage law. (2) Fulfillment of the principle of justice has not reached the standard&#13;
of equality because the presence of the label "unregistered marriage" in population&#13;
documents continues to maintain social stigma. Furthermore, the principle of&#13;
children's freedom is violated because children are still burdened with the&#13;
responsibility of proving civil relationships through complicated litigation due to&#13;
their parents' administrative negligence. This study concludes that legal&#13;
reconstruction is necessary to eliminate discrimination regarding children's status&#13;
in order to achieve substantive justice.</mods:abstract><mods:classification authority="lcc">340.1 Perlindungan Hukum</mods:classification><mods:originInfo><mods:dateIssued encoding="iso8061">2026-01-27</mods:dateIssued></mods:originInfo><mods:originInfo><mods:publisher>UIN SUNAN KALIJAGA YOGYAKARTA;FAKULTAS SYARIAH DAN HUKUM</mods:publisher></mods:originInfo><mods:genre>Thesis</mods:genre></mods:mods>