{
      "department": "FAKULTAS SYARIAH DAN HUKUM",
      "subjects": [
        297.413
      ],
      "eprintid": 75963,
      "thesis_type": "skripsi",
      "date": "2026-02-27",
      "userid": 12460,
      "documents": [
          {
            "language": "id",
            "placement": 1,
            "eprintid": 75963,
            "files": [
                {
                  "hash_type": "MD5",
                  "mtime": "2026-04-07 02:35:40",
                  "datasetid": "document",
                  "fileid": 1811927,
                  "objectid": 1047687,
                  "uri": "http:\/\/digilib.uin-suka.ac.id\/id\/file\/1811927",
                  "mime_type": "application\/pdf",
                  "hash": "b69410d5b1a909d84cf08ece5e84e205",
                  "filesize": 9146344,
                  "filename": "22103060062_BAB-I_IV-atau-V_DAFTAR-PUSTAKA.pdf"
                }
            ],
            "content": "published",
            "rev_number": 3,
            "uri": "http:\/\/digilib.uin-suka.ac.id\/id\/document\/1047687",
            "main": "22103060062_BAB-I_IV-atau-V_DAFTAR-PUSTAKA.pdf",
            "mime_type": "application\/pdf",
            "docid": 1047687,
            "format": "text",
            "security": "public",
            "pos": 1,
            "formatdesc": "HUKUM QADHA SHALAT TANPA UZUR SYAR’I: STUDI PERBANDINGAN ANTARA ULAMA NU DAN ULAMA SALAFI DI YOGYAKARTA"
          },
          {
            "language": "id",
            "placement": 2,
            "eprintid": 75963,
            "files": [
                {
                  "hash_type": "MD5",
                  "mtime": "2026-04-07 02:35:42",
                  "datasetid": "document",
                  "fileid": 1811930,
                  "objectid": 1047688,
                  "uri": "http:\/\/digilib.uin-suka.ac.id\/id\/file\/1811930",
                  "mime_type": "application\/pdf",
                  "hash": "1f6839b65a34a64f88b115ada050ab69",
                  "filesize": 17740163,
                  "filename": "22103060062_BAB-II_sampai_SEBELUM-BAB-TERAKHIR.pdf"
                }
            ],
            "content": "published",
            "rev_number": 3,
            "uri": "http:\/\/digilib.uin-suka.ac.id\/id\/document\/1047688",
            "main": "22103060062_BAB-II_sampai_SEBELUM-BAB-TERAKHIR.pdf",
            "mime_type": "application\/pdf",
            "docid": 1047688,
            "format": "text",
            "security": "validuser",
            "pos": 2,
            "formatdesc": "HUKUM QADHA SHALAT TANPA UZUR SYAR’I: STUDI PERBANDINGAN ANTARA ULAMA NU DAN ULAMA SALAFI DI YOGYAKARTA"
          }
      ],
      "rev_number": 10,
      "creators": [
        {
          "name": {
            "lineage": null,
            "given": "NIM.: 22103060062",
            "honourific": null,
            "family": "Ahmad Huzaify"
          }
        }
      ],
      "dir": "disk0\/00\/07\/59\/63",
      "keywords": "Qadha Shalat, Ulama NU, Ulama Salafi, Ikhtilaf Fahm al-Nass",
      "lastmod": "2026-04-07 03:02:22",
      "ispublished": "pub",
      "metadata_visibility": "show",
      "date_type": "published",
      "eprint_status": "archive",
      "status_changed": "2026-04-07 03:02:22",
      "datestamp": "2026-04-07 03:02:22",
      "uri": "http:\/\/digilib.uin-suka.ac.id\/id\/eprint\/75963",
      "thesis_name": "other",
      "note": "Dr. Muhammad Anis Mashduqi, Lc., M.S.I.",
      "full_text_status": "restricted",
      "contact_email": "muh.khabib@uin-suka.ac.id",
      "divisions": [
        "jur_pma"
      ],
      "abstract": "This study examines the legal ruling on qadha prayer performed without a\r\nvalid shar’i excuse, which remains a debated issue in Islamic jurisprudence and\r\nhas direct implications for Muslim religious practice. Prayer is a mandatory act of\r\nworship that is bound to specific prescribed times, giving rise to legal questions\r\nwhen it is deliberately abandoned without a legitimate justification recognized by\r\nIslamic law. Differences of opinion among scholars on this issue are closely related\r\nto their differing methods of understanding and interpreting the textual sources of\r\nthe Qur’an and Hadith. Nahdlatul Ulama (NU) and Salafi, as two prominent\r\nIslamic scholarly currents in Indonesia, employ distinct approaches to legal\r\nreasoning (istinbāṭ al-aḥkām), making this issue particularly significant for\r\ncomparative analysis. This study aims to analyze the perspectives of NU scholars\r\nand Salafi scholars in Yogyakarta regarding the ruling on qadha prayer without a\r\nshar’i excuse using the theory of al-ikhtilāf fī fahm al-naṣṣ wa tafsīrihi.\r\nThis research adopts a qualitative method with a descriptive-analytical and\r\ncomparative design. An uṣūl al-fiqh approach is employed to examine the methods\r\nof legal reasoning used by the scholars. Primary data were obtained through\r\ninterviews with NU and Salafi scholars in Yogyakarta, while secondary data were\r\ndrawn from classical and contemporary works of fiqh, uṣūl al-fiqh, and other\r\nrelevant literature. Data analysis was conducted through systematic processes of\r\ndata reduction, data presentation, and conclusion drawing.\r\nThe findings indicate that NU scholars in Yogyakarta consistently maintain\r\nthe obligation of performing qadha prayer for those who deliberately abandon\r\nprayer without a shar’i excuse, based on the principle that the obligation of prayer\r\ndoes not lapse merely due to the expiration of its prescribed time, and by employing\r\nqiyās awlawī derived from the hadith concerning qadha prayer for those who sleep\r\nor forget. Nevertheless, internal differences exist within NU regarding the\r\nobligation to hasten qadha prayer and restrictions on performing supererogatory\r\nprayers. Meanwhile, Salafi scholars in Yogyakarta demonstrate diverse viewpoints:\r\nsome Salafi scholars affiliated with legal schools accept the obligation of qadha\r\nprayer, whereas non-affiliated Salafi scholars argue that prayers deliberately\r\nabandoned cannot be made up and should instead be compensated through sincere\r\nrepentance and the performance of additional voluntary acts of worship, on the\r\ngrounds that time constitutes an absolute condition for the validity of prayer. Thus,\r\nthe divergence between NU and Salafi scholars stems from differences in\r\nmethodological approaches to understanding and interpreting the textual sources,\r\nrather than from differing commitments to the fundamental obligation of prayer.",
      "type": "thesis",
      "title": "HUKUM QADHA SHALAT TANPA UZUR SYAR’I: STUDI PERBANDINGAN ANTARA ULAMA NU DAN ULAMA SALAFI DI YOGYAKARTA",
      "institution": "UIN SUNAN KALIJAGA YOGYAKARTA",
      "pages": 192
    }