%A NIM.: 22103060062 Ahmad Huzaify
%O Dr. Muhammad Anis Mashduqi, Lc., M.S.I.
%T HUKUM QADHA SHALAT TANPA UZUR SYAR’I: STUDI PERBANDINGAN ANTARA ULAMA NU DAN ULAMA SALAFI DI YOGYAKARTA
%X This study examines the legal ruling on qadha prayer performed without a
valid shar’i excuse, which remains a debated issue in Islamic jurisprudence and
has direct implications for Muslim religious practice. Prayer is a mandatory act of
worship that is bound to specific prescribed times, giving rise to legal questions
when it is deliberately abandoned without a legitimate justification recognized by
Islamic law. Differences of opinion among scholars on this issue are closely related
to their differing methods of understanding and interpreting the textual sources of
the Qur’an and Hadith. Nahdlatul Ulama (NU) and Salafi, as two prominent
Islamic scholarly currents in Indonesia, employ distinct approaches to legal
reasoning (istinbāṭ al-aḥkām), making this issue particularly significant for
comparative analysis. This study aims to analyze the perspectives of NU scholars
and Salafi scholars in Yogyakarta regarding the ruling on qadha prayer without a
shar’i excuse using the theory of al-ikhtilāf fī fahm al-naṣṣ wa tafsīrihi.
This research adopts a qualitative method with a descriptive-analytical and
comparative design. An uṣūl al-fiqh approach is employed to examine the methods
of legal reasoning used by the scholars. Primary data were obtained through
interviews with NU and Salafi scholars in Yogyakarta, while secondary data were
drawn from classical and contemporary works of fiqh, uṣūl al-fiqh, and other
relevant literature. Data analysis was conducted through systematic processes of
data reduction, data presentation, and conclusion drawing.
The findings indicate that NU scholars in Yogyakarta consistently maintain
the obligation of performing qadha prayer for those who deliberately abandon
prayer without a shar’i excuse, based on the principle that the obligation of prayer
does not lapse merely due to the expiration of its prescribed time, and by employing
qiyās awlawī derived from the hadith concerning qadha prayer for those who sleep
or forget. Nevertheless, internal differences exist within NU regarding the
obligation to hasten qadha prayer and restrictions on performing supererogatory
prayers. Meanwhile, Salafi scholars in Yogyakarta demonstrate diverse viewpoints:
some Salafi scholars affiliated with legal schools accept the obligation of qadha
prayer, whereas non-affiliated Salafi scholars argue that prayers deliberately
abandoned cannot be made up and should instead be compensated through sincere
repentance and the performance of additional voluntary acts of worship, on the
grounds that time constitutes an absolute condition for the validity of prayer. Thus,
the divergence between NU and Salafi scholars stems from differences in
methodological approaches to understanding and interpreting the textual sources,
rather than from differing commitments to the fundamental obligation of prayer.
%K Qadha Shalat, Ulama NU, Ulama Salafi, Ikhtilaf Fahm al-Nass
%D 2026
%I UIN SUNAN KALIJAGA YOGYAKARTA
%L digilib75963