%0 Thesis
%9 Skripsi
%A Rizky Ali Musthofa, NIM.: 22103060071
%B FAKULTAS SYARIAH DAN HUKUM
%D 2026
%F digilib:75964
%I UIN SUNAN KALIJAGA YOGYAKARTA
%K Disparitas Putusan, Poligami, Hamil di Luar Nikah, Nasab,  Kekosongan Hukum
%P 147
%T HAMIL DI LUAR NIKAH SEBAGAI ALASAN POLIGAMI (STUDI KOMPARATIF PUTUSAN NOMOR 5/PDT.G/2024/PA.TA DAN PUTUSAN NOMOR 1048/PDT.G/2024/PA.SMN)
%U https://digilib.uin-suka.ac.id/id/eprint/75964/
%X Positive law in Indonesia, through Article 4 paragraph (2) of Law Number  1 of 1974, regulates the alternative requirements for polygamy permits restrictively.  This triggers a vacuum of law when faced with the social reality of an out-ofwedlock  pregnancy by a prospective second wife. This normative vacuum creates a  disparity of judgments in religious courts. This research aims to analyze the root of  the disparity and the judges' legal reasoning in the Tulungagung Religious Court  Decision Number 5/Pdt.G/2024/PA.TA, which granted the petition, and the Sleman  Religious Court Decision Number 1048/Pdt.G/2024/PA.Smn, which rejected it.  This research is normative legal research utilizing a statute approach, a  conceptual approach, and a comparative approach. The analytical tools used are  Micro-Level Comparative Law Theory and Maqashid Sharia Theory (Sadd al-  Dzari'ah and Fath al-Dzari'ah).  The results show that the disparity in judgments stems from differences in  the judges' paradigms in conducting legal discovery (rechtsvinding). The  Tulungagung Religious Court Judge applied a progressive-sociological paradigm  through the Fath al-Dzari'ah approach, granting the polygamy permit to save the  clarity of the child's lineage (Hifz an-Nasl) as a state of emergency (dharuriyyah).  Conversely, the Sleman Religious Court Judge applied a rigid textual-normative  paradigm through the Sadd al-Dzari'ah approach, rejecting the petition to maintain  legal certainty and prevent the normalization of adultery. The author concludes that  the lineage protection-oriented approach guarantees substantive justice much  better. Therefore, family law reform is needed to accommodate the protection of a  child's lineage as an exception for polygamy, while still tightening the proof of  cumulative financial requirements and the first wife's consent in court.
%Z Vita Fitria, S. Ag., M. Ag.