TY  - THES
N1  - Vita Fitria, S. Ag., M. Ag.
ID  - digilib75964
UR  - https://digilib.uin-suka.ac.id/id/eprint/75964/
A1  - Rizky Ali Musthofa, NIM.: 22103060071
Y1  - 2026/02/24/
N2  - Positive law in Indonesia, through Article 4 paragraph (2) of Law Number
1 of 1974, regulates the alternative requirements for polygamy permits restrictively.
This triggers a vacuum of law when faced with the social reality of an out-ofwedlock
pregnancy by a prospective second wife. This normative vacuum creates a
disparity of judgments in religious courts. This research aims to analyze the root of
the disparity and the judges' legal reasoning in the Tulungagung Religious Court
Decision Number 5/Pdt.G/2024/PA.TA, which granted the petition, and the Sleman
Religious Court Decision Number 1048/Pdt.G/2024/PA.Smn, which rejected it.
This research is normative legal research utilizing a statute approach, a
conceptual approach, and a comparative approach. The analytical tools used are
Micro-Level Comparative Law Theory and Maqashid Sharia Theory (Sadd al-
Dzari'ah and Fath al-Dzari'ah).
The results show that the disparity in judgments stems from differences in
the judges' paradigms in conducting legal discovery (rechtsvinding). The
Tulungagung Religious Court Judge applied a progressive-sociological paradigm
through the Fath al-Dzari'ah approach, granting the polygamy permit to save the
clarity of the child's lineage (Hifz an-Nasl) as a state of emergency (dharuriyyah).
Conversely, the Sleman Religious Court Judge applied a rigid textual-normative
paradigm through the Sadd al-Dzari'ah approach, rejecting the petition to maintain
legal certainty and prevent the normalization of adultery. The author concludes that
the lineage protection-oriented approach guarantees substantive justice much
better. Therefore, family law reform is needed to accommodate the protection of a
child's lineage as an exception for polygamy, while still tightening the proof of
cumulative financial requirements and the first wife's consent in court.
PB  - UIN SUNAN KALIJAGA YOGYAKARTA
KW  - Disparitas Putusan
KW  -  Poligami
KW  -  Hamil di Luar Nikah
KW  -  Nasab
KW  - 
Kekosongan Hukum
M1  - skripsi
TI  - HAMIL DI LUAR NIKAH SEBAGAI ALASAN POLIGAMI (STUDI KOMPARATIF PUTUSAN NOMOR 5/PDT.G/2024/PA.TA DAN PUTUSAN NOMOR 1048/PDT.G/2024/PA.SMN)
AV  - restricted
EP  - 147
ER  -