…
comment: The repository administrator has not yet configured an RDF license.
primary topic: DUALISME AKUNTABILITAS PUTUSAN PENYELENGGARA PEMILU ANTARA DKPP DAN PTUN

DUALISME AKUNTABILITAS PUTUSAN PENYELENGGARA PEMILU ANTARA DKPP DAN PTUN
type: Thesis
type: Article
abstract: This study discusses the dualism of accountability for election organizer decisions between the DKPP and the PTUN. The problem stems from PTUN Decision No. 82/G/2020/PTUN.JKT, which ordered the annulment of Presidential Decree No. 34/P. 2020, which automatically invalidated DKPP ethical decision No. 317-PKE-DKPP/X/2019. This issue has caused legal uncertainty because the constitution does not further regulate the competence of the PTUN in annulling DKPP ethical decisions. This issue then gave rise to three questions: 1). What causes the dualism of accountability for election organizer decisions between the DKPP and the PTUN and their position in the perspective of the rule of law; 2). What is the view of siyāsah qaḍhā’iyyah on the dualism of accountability for election organizer decisions between the DKPP and the PTUN; 3). How can the dualism of accountability for election organizer decisions between the DKPP and the PTUN be harmonized. This type of research uses a literature study, supplemented by a normative legal approach through legislation and a case approach. Furthermore, the data sources and legal materials consist of primary and secondary data collected using data collection techniques such as searching and tracing reference materials such as bibliographies, research results, scientific magazines, scientific bulletins, and journals. Data analysis techniques use qualitative deductive analysis techniques. Meanwhile, the theories used in this study include: the theory of the rule of law, the theory of state institutions, and siyāsah qaḍhā’iyyah. The results of this study show that: first, the cause of the dualism of accountability for election organizers' decisions between the DKPP and the PTUN and their position in the perspective of the state is that there is confusion between ethical norms and legal norms, compounded by the issues and dynamics of constitutional court decisions, and in the perspective of the rule of law, there is a difference in the position …
date: 2026-01-27
status: published
author list: authors
type: EPrint
type: ThesisEPrint
is part of: repository
has document: DUALISME AKUNTABILITAS PUTUSAN PENYELENGGARA PEMILU ANTARA DKPP DAN PTUN (Text)
has version: DUALISME AKUNTABILITAS PUTUSAN PENYELENGGARA PEMILU ANTARA DKPP DAN PTUN (Text)
has published: DUALISME AKUNTABILITAS PUTUSAN PENYELENGGARA PEMILU ANTARA DKPP DAN PTUN (Text)
subject: 342.07 Hukum Pemilihan Umum, Hukum Pemilu

DUALISME AKUNTABILITAS PUTUSAN PENYELENGGARA PEMILU ANTARA DKPP DAN PTUN (Text)
type: Document
has file: 23203012001_BAB-I_IV-atau-V_DAFTAR-PUSTAKA.pdf
has part: 23203012001_BAB-I_IV-atau-V_DAFTAR-PUSTAKA.pdf

DUALISME AKUNTABILITAS PUTUSAN PENYELENGGARA PEMILU ANTARA DKPP DAN PTUN (Text)
type: Document

UIN SUNAN KALIJAGA YOGYAKARTA
type: Organization

FAKULTAS SYARIAH DAN HUKUM, UIN SUNAN KALIJAGA YOGYAKARTA
type: Organization

NIM.: 23203012001 George Soros Setiawan Day
type: Person
given name: NIM.: 23203012001
family name: George Soros Setiawan Day

HTML Summary of #75982 DUALISME AKUNTABILITAS PUTUSAN PENYELENGGARA PEMILU ANTARA DKPP DAN PTUN
format: text/html
primary topic: DUALISME AKUNTABILITAS PUTUSAN PENYELENGGARA PEMILU ANTARA DKPP DAN PTUN

342.07 Hukum Pemilihan Umum, Hukum Pemilu
type: Concept