<> "The repository administrator has not yet configured an RDF license."^^ . <> . . . "DUALISME AKUNTABILITAS PUTUSAN PENYELENGGARA PEMILU ANTARA DKPP DAN PTUN"^^ . "This study discusses the dualism of accountability for election organizer\r\ndecisions between the DKPP and the PTUN. The problem stems from PTUN\r\nDecision No. 82/G/2020/PTUN.JKT, which ordered the annulment of Presidential\r\nDecree No. 34/P. 2020, which automatically invalidated DKPP ethical decision No.\r\n317-PKE-DKPP/X/2019. This issue has caused legal uncertainty because the\r\nconstitution does not further regulate the competence of the PTUN in annulling\r\nDKPP ethical decisions. This issue then gave rise to three questions: 1). What\r\ncauses the dualism of accountability for election organizer decisions between the\r\nDKPP and the PTUN and their position in the perspective of the rule of law; 2).\r\nWhat is the view of siyāsah qaḍhā’iyyah on the dualism of accountability for\r\nelection organizer decisions between the DKPP and the PTUN; 3). How can the\r\ndualism of accountability for election organizer decisions between the DKPP and\r\nthe PTUN be harmonized.\r\nThis type of research uses a literature study, supplemented by a normative\r\nlegal approach through legislation and a case approach. Furthermore, the data\r\nsources and legal materials consist of primary and secondary data collected using\r\ndata collection techniques such as searching and tracing reference materials such\r\nas bibliographies, research results, scientific magazines, scientific bulletins, and\r\njournals. Data analysis techniques use qualitative deductive analysis techniques.\r\nMeanwhile, the theories used in this study include: the theory of the rule of law, the\r\ntheory of state institutions, and siyāsah qaḍhā’iyyah.\r\nThe results of this study show that: first, the cause of the dualism of\r\naccountability for election organizers' decisions between the DKPP and the PTUN\r\nand their position in the perspective of the state is that there is confusion between\r\nethical norms and legal norms, compounded by the issues and dynamics of\r\nconstitutional court decisions, and in the perspective of the rule of law, there is a\r\ndifference in the position of decisions between the DKPP and the PTUN; second,\r\nthe siyāsah qaḍhā’iyyah view of dualism, namely, the DKPP as a reflection of the\r\nwilāyah ḥisbah function and the PTUN as a reflection of the wilāyah qaḍhā’\r\nfunction, there is a fundamental position between wilāyah ḥisbah (DKPP) and\r\nwilāyah qaḍhā’ (PTUN), whereas the PTUN adjudicates presidential decisions, but\r\npresidential decisions are based on DKPP decisions; third, harmonizing the\r\ndualism of accountability for these decisions, namely through amendments to the\r\n1945 Constitution as a long-term solution and through a Supreme Court circular\r\nletter as a short-term solution."^^ . "2026-01-27" . . . . "UIN SUNAN KALIJAGA YOGYAKARTA"^^ . . . "FAKULTAS SYARIAH DAN HUKUM, UIN SUNAN KALIJAGA YOGYAKARTA"^^ . . . . . . . . . "NIM.: 23203012001"^^ . "George Soros Setiawan Day"^^ . "NIM.: 23203012001 George Soros Setiawan Day"^^ . . . . . . "DUALISME AKUNTABILITAS PUTUSAN PENYELENGGARA PEMILU ANTARA DKPP DAN PTUN (Text)"^^ . . . . . "23203012001_BAB-I_IV-atau-V_DAFTAR-PUSTAKA.pdf"^^ . . . "DUALISME AKUNTABILITAS PUTUSAN PENYELENGGARA PEMILU ANTARA DKPP DAN PTUN (Text)"^^ . . . . "HTML Summary of #75982 \n\nDUALISME AKUNTABILITAS PUTUSAN PENYELENGGARA PEMILU ANTARA DKPP DAN PTUN\n\n" . "text/html" . . . "342.07 Hukum Pemilihan Umum, Hukum Pemilu" . .