@mastersthesis{digilib75984,
           month = {February},
           title = {DISKRESI PENETAPAN WALI NIKAH BAGI ANAK HASIL HUBUNGAN DI LUAR NIKAH (STUDI KASUS PADA KUA DI KABUPATEN NGAWI)},
          school = {UIN SUNAN KALIJAGA YOGYAKARTA},
          author = {NIM.: 23203012014 Achmad Roihan Jauhari},
            year = {2026},
            note = {Prof. Dr. Fathorrahman, S.Ag., M.Si.},
        keywords = {Wali Nikah, Anak Luar Nikah, Hermeneutika Hukum, Maslahah Mursalah},
             url = {https://digilib.uin-suka.ac.id/id/eprint/75984/},
        abstract = {This study examines the differences in the practice of determining marriage guardians for children born out of wedlock in several offices of religious affairs (KUA) in Ngawi Regency. Although the appointment of marriage guardians has been regulated by the Marriage Law, the Compilation of Islamic Law (KHI), and technical regulations of the Ministry of Religious Affairs, variations still occur at the local level. These differences reflect the dynamic implementation of Islamic family law, particularly in the relationship between Islamic jurisprudence and state regulations in marriage registration.
This research uses a field research design with a descriptive-analytical method and a socio-normative approach. Data were collected through interviews with the heads of KUA offices in Karanganyar, Widodaren, Mantingan, Paron, Pitu, and Kedunggalar. The study relies on primary data from interviews and secondary data from official documents, archives, books, and relevant literature. In analyzing the data, the author employs qualitative data analysis using an inductive approach. The theoretical framework applied in this study consists of legal hermeneutics to examine the interpretive construction of islamic marriage officiant in determining the marriage guardian, as well as the theory of ma{\d s}la{\d h}ah mursalah as an analytical framework to assess the dimension of public interest in determining the marriage guardian for children born out of wedlock.
The findings show that the differences in determining marriage guardians are not caused by different legal sources, but by different ways of understanding and applying those sources. All KUA offices refer to both national regulations and Islamic law, but they prioritize them differently. The differences in the determination of the marriage guardian across the six offices of religious affairs (KUA) do not constitute inconsistency; rather, they reflect interpretive variations concerning fiqh texts and state regulations. From the perspective of legal hermeneutics, the determination of the marriage guardian represents a fusion of fiqh, positive law, and social reality. Meanwhile, from the perspective of ma{\d s}la{\d h}ah mursalah, the practice is oriented toward the protection of lineage, the validity of the marriage contract, and broader social welfare.}
}