<mods:mods version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" xmlns:mods="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"><mods:titleInfo><mods:title>OPTIMALISASI DAYA TARIK DAN KUALITAS LAYANAN GEOWISATA GOA PINDUL BERBASIS ERGONOMI PARTISIPATORI: ANALISIS MODIFIED GEOSITE ASSESSMENT MODEL (M-GAM) DENGAN TAMBAHAN FAKTOR SAFETY DAN ENJOYMENT</mods:title></mods:titleInfo><mods:name type="personal"><mods:namePart type="given">NIM.: 21106060066</mods:namePart><mods:namePart type="family">Puan Nisya Novianica</mods:namePart><mods:role><mods:roleTerm type="text">author</mods:roleTerm></mods:role></mods:name><mods:abstract>Indonesia’s tourism industry is rapidly growing, including the geotourism sector which emphasizes&#13;
conservation, education, and community involvement. Goa Pindul, located in Gunungkidul Regency,&#13;
Yogyakarta, is a community-based geotourism destination offering cave tubing through an&#13;
underground river. Despite its potential and increasing visitors, the site faces challenges in visitor&#13;
capacity control and the effectiveness of guide services and information delivery. This study aims to&#13;
evaluate the attractiveness and service quality of Goa Pindul using the Modified Geosite Assessment&#13;
Model (M-GAM), with added safety and enjoyment indicators. Data were collected through&#13;
observation, interviews, questionnaires from 136 tourists using the exit poll sampling technique, and&#13;
expert assessments from five site managers. Goa Pindul is positioned in quadrant Z22 of the MGAM&#13;
matrix, indicating a balance between main and additional values. The highest score was&#13;
recorded in VEn5 (0.81), reflecting the perception that the destination is unique and worth&#13;
recommending. In contrast, low scores were found in: (1) VSf3 – tourists removed safety equipment&#13;
during the activity; (2) VPr4 – cave visitor capacity is not optimally managed, posing environmental&#13;
risks; and (3) VTr4 – multiple directional signs from different operators caused confusion. To&#13;
address these issues, a participatory ergonomics approach was applied, including problem&#13;
identification, root cause analysis using the Five Whys method, and solution development through&#13;
Focus Group Discussions (FGDs). Recommendations include assistant guides, safe zones,&#13;
integrated signage, and synchronized digital navigation to support sustainable geotourism&#13;
management.</mods:abstract><mods:classification authority="lcc">670 Teknik Industri</mods:classification><mods:originInfo><mods:dateIssued encoding="iso8061">2025-06-30</mods:dateIssued></mods:originInfo><mods:originInfo><mods:publisher>UIN SUNAN KALIJAGA YOGYAKARTA;FAKULTAS SAINS DAN TEKNOLOGI</mods:publisher></mods:originInfo><mods:genre>Thesis</mods:genre></mods:mods>