@phdthesis{digilib76523,
           month = {August},
           title = {IMPLIKASI QIRA?AT TERHADAP ISTINBA{\d T} HUKUM DALAM SURAT AN-NISA?: PERSPEKTIF TAFSIR AT-TIBYAN KARANGAN AT-TUSI},
          school = {UIN SUNAN KALIJAGA YOGYAKARTA},
          author = {NIM.: 21105030080 Alin Adzkanuha},
            year = {2025},
            note = {Fitriana Firdausi, S.Th.I., M.Hum.},
        keywords = {qira?at; A{\d t}-{\c T}usi; Istinba{\d t} Hukum; Tafsir Syi?ah},
             url = {https://digilib.uin-suka.ac.id/id/eprint/76523/},
        abstract = {This thesis seeks to demonstrate the implications of the use of qir{\=a}?{\=a}t in the process of istinb{\=a}{\d t} al-{\d h}ukm within the Sh{\=i}?{\=i} tradition, as represented in al-Tiby{\=a}n f{\=i} Tafs{\=i}r al-Qur?{\=a}n authored by Shaykh A{\d t}-{\c T}{\=u}si. The diversity of legal rulings within Sh{\=i}?{\=i} jurisprudence indicates the presence of exegetical differences in interpreting the Qur?{\=a}n. Furthermore, the fact that a considerable number of Sh{\=i}?{\=i} exegetical works{--}al-Tiby{\=a}n among them{--}incorporate discussions of qir{\=a}?{\=a}t demonstrates that, in the Sh{\=i}?{\=i} tradition, qir{\=a}?{\=a}t are not confined merely to reading variations or ritual aspects. Rather, they function as analytical instruments in the derivation of legal rulings. This study thus seeks to elucidate the implications of qir{\=a}?{\=a}t for legal derivation within Sh{\=i}?{\=i} thought. Moreover, scholarly engagement with the study of qir{\=a}?{\=a}t in the Sh{\=i}?{\=i} context remains limited. As a point of comparison, this research will also examine selected instances of qir{\=a}?{\=a}t within S{\=u}rat al-Nis{\=a}?. A{\d t}-{\c T}{\=u}si?s attitude toward qir{\=a}?{\=a}t can be characterized as selective and methodological. He did not accept all variants of recitation, but rather chose to cite only mutaw{\=a}tir qir{\=a}?{\=a}t and narrations transmitted from the Ahl al-Bait in certain verses. Qir{\=a}?{\=a}t were positioned by him as a crucial instrument in his exegetical method, since in several instances he referred to them not merely in terms of linguistic aspects, but also with regard to the authority of transmission and their relevance to legal reasoning (istinba{\d t} al-{\d h}ukm). In S{\=u}rat an-Nis{\=a}?, two examples of qir{\=a}?{\=a}t are found to have legal implications within the Sh{\=i}?{\=i} tradition: (1) verse 24 with a qir{\=a}?{\=a}t sy{\=a}dzdzah that serves as the basis for the permissibility of temporary marriage (nik{\=a}{\d h} al-mut?ah), and (2) verse 43 with a qir{\=a}?{\=a}t mutaw{\=a}tirah that underpins the view that physical contact between the sexes does not invalidate ablution (wu{\d d}{\=u}?). This study demonstrates that although qir{\=a}?{\=a}t do not always produce direct legal consequences, they nevertheless hold a significant role in shaping the legal construction of Sh{\=i}?{\=i} exegesis.}
}