<mods:mods version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" xmlns:mods="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"><mods:titleInfo><mods:title>MEDIASI SOLIDARITAS PALESTINA DALAM&#13;
EKOSISTEM MEDIA DIGITAL INDONESIA:&#13;
KONSTRUKSI, OPERASIONALISASI, REARTIKULASI</mods:title></mods:titleInfo><mods:name type="personal"><mods:namePart type="given">NIM.:19300012006</mods:namePart><mods:namePart type="family">Nanang Mizwar Hasyim</mods:namePart><mods:role><mods:roleTerm type="text">author</mods:roleTerm></mods:role></mods:name><mods:abstract>Studies on the relationship between media and religion in&#13;
Indonesia still exhibit limitations in explaining the interconnections&#13;
between media discourse production, public communication practices,&#13;
and the dynamics of digital communication. Against the backdrop of&#13;
the escalating Israel–Palestine conflict, which has resonated widely in&#13;
the Indonesian public sphere, solidarity with Palestine has become a&#13;
significant issue. This phenomenon not only reflects religious&#13;
sentiment but also serves as a space for the articulation of identity,&#13;
ideological representation, and discourse in digital media. Within this&#13;
framework, Palestinian solidarity is understood as a discursive&#13;
practice formed through the relations between media, the public, and&#13;
digital platforms. This practice unfolds through processes of&#13;
distribution and negotiation of meaning, resulting in dynamics of&#13;
fragmentation, contestation, and intensification. Thus, media function&#13;
not merely as conveyors of information but as mechanisms for the&#13;
construction, operationalization, and rearticulation of meaning within&#13;
the digital media ecosystem. Based on this framework, this study aims&#13;
to analyze and explain Palestinian solidarity as an ongoing discursive&#13;
process within the digital media ecosystem. This also distinguishes the&#13;
study from previous research, which tends to adopt a linear and&#13;
fragmented approach between text production and the circulation of&#13;
meaning.&#13;
In operationalizing this framework, the study employs a&#13;
qualitative approach with a critical perspective through three stages of&#13;
analysis: the construction of solidarity discourse, its operationalization&#13;
in public communication practices, and its rearticulation in digital&#13;
circulation. The analysis utilizes Teun A. Van Dijk’s Critical&#13;
Discourse Analysis to uncover representational structures and power&#13;
relations within media texts, as well as Stewart M. Hoover’s&#13;
perspective on the mediation of religion to explain the formation of&#13;
religious meaning in public culture. The data consist of 901 news texts&#13;
selected from a total of 17,375 articles, as well as 420 posts from the X platform, drawn from Kompas.com, Detik.com, and Republika.co.id&#13;
during the period from October 2023 to April 2024.&#13;
The findings indicate that the three media outlets frame&#13;
solidarity in different ways. Republika.co.id interprets solidarity as a&#13;
normative religious obligation, while Kompas.com emphasizes a&#13;
universal humanitarian framework, and Detik.com presents solidarity&#13;
through event-based narratives. At the operationalization stage,&#13;
Palestinian solidarity is enacted through religious authorization, moral&#13;
framing of the conflict, and the repetition of representations that&#13;
enable solidarity to function as a normative reference in public&#13;
communication. This process reinforces solidarity as a symbol&#13;
endowed with social legitimacy. However, in digital circulation, the&#13;
meaning of Palestinian solidarity does not move linearly; rather, it&#13;
undergoes transformation through the interaction between media&#13;
editorial strategies, platform technical logics, and content visibility&#13;
mechanisms. This interaction generates fragmentation, contestation,&#13;
and intensification of discourse. Accordingly, Palestinian solidarity&#13;
can be understood as a layered discursive process mediated by the&#13;
interaction between media strategies, digital platform logics, and&#13;
public dynamics within the contemporary digital communication&#13;
ecosystem</mods:abstract><mods:classification authority="lcc">Ilmu Agama Islam</mods:classification><mods:originInfo><mods:dateIssued encoding="iso8061">2026-05-25</mods:dateIssued></mods:originInfo><mods:originInfo><mods:publisher>PASCASARJANA ILMU AGAMA ISLAM;UIN SUNAN KALIJAGA YOGYAKARTA</mods:publisher></mods:originInfo><mods:genre>Thesis</mods:genre></mods:mods>