@article{digilib76561,
          volume = {50},
          number = {1},
           month = {June},
          author = {- Ubaidillah and - Elvusal Mammadov},
           title = {DISPUTING THE NARRATIONS OF THE COMPANIONS A Speech Acts Analysis of ?{\^A}?isyah RA?s Corrective Responses in Prophetic Had{\^i}ts},
       publisher = {Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara},
            year = {2026},
         journal = {MIQOT: Jurnal Ilmu-ilmu Keislaman},
           pages = {214--234},
        keywords = {{\^A}?isyah RA, speech act theory, Prophetic
Had{\^i}ts, corrective discourse,
epistemic authority},
             url = {https://digilib.uin-suka.ac.id/id/eprint/76561/},
        abstract = {This article investigates ?{\^A}?isyah RA?s corrective interventions toward
the narrations of other Companions within the corpus of Prophetic
had{\^i}ts. While
classical and contemporary scholarship has long acknowledged ?{\^A}?isyah?s role in
correcting transmitted reports, existing studies have largely approached this
phenomenon descriptively and have rarely examined the linguistic and pragmatic
structure of her corrective discourse. Employing a qualitative pragmatic approach,
this study analyzes a selected corpus of
had{\^i}ts from Sha
h{\^i}
h al-Bukh{\^a}r{\^i} and Sha
h{\^i}
h
Muslim in which ?{\^A}?isyah RA explicitly disputes or clarifies reported narrations.
The analysis draws on speech act theory as an analytical framework to identify
patterns of corrective discourse, focusing on assertive, directive, and expressive
acts and the linguistic markers through which they are realized, such as negation
structures, evaluative verbs, and expressive formulas. Rather than treating these
interventions solely as juridical or theological statements, the study interprets
them as context-bound communicative acts within early
had{\^i}ts transmission. The
findings suggest that ?{\^A}?isyah?s corrective responses function as discursive
mechanisms for negotiating epistemic authority at the level of narration, grounded
in proximity to the Prophet and experiential knowledge. By integrating pragmatic
speech act analysis with the conventions of
had{\^i}ts scholarship, this study proposes
a linguistic framework for examining corrective discourse in early
had{\^i}ts
transmission. It contributes to a more systematic understanding of how epistemic
authority was negotiated within early narrational interaction.}
}