<mods:mods version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" xmlns:mods="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"><mods:titleInfo><mods:title>PENGARUH MODEL ARGUMENT DRIVEN INQUIRY (ADI) BERDIFERENSIASI TERHADAP KETERAMPILAN ARGUMENTASI ILMIAH PADA MATERI PEMANASAN GLOBAL UNTUK PESERTA DIDIK SMA</mods:title></mods:titleInfo><mods:name type="personal"><mods:namePart type="given">NIM.: 22104050002</mods:namePart><mods:namePart type="family">Anggun Nur Aini</mods:namePart><mods:role><mods:roleTerm type="text">author</mods:roleTerm></mods:role></mods:name><mods:abstract>Scientific argumentation skills are one of the essential skills that students need&#13;
to possess in 21st-century science education. Efforts to improve scientific&#13;
argumentation skills involve the use of appropriate instructional models, one of&#13;
which is the differentiated Argument Driven Inquiry (ADI) model. This study aims&#13;
to: 1) determine the effect of the differentiated ADI learning model on students’&#13;
scientific argumentation skills regarding global warming; and 2) determine the&#13;
improvement in students’ scientific argumentation skills after the implementation of&#13;
the differentiated ADI learning model.&#13;
This study employed a quasi-experimental design with a nonequivalent&#13;
control group. The sampling technique used was saturation sampling, involving the&#13;
entire study population. The research sample consisted of class X-1 as the&#13;
experimental class and class X-2 as the control class. The data collection&#13;
instrument was an essay-type test comprising 10 items. The data analysis&#13;
techniques used included normality tests, homogeneity tests, paired sample t-tests,&#13;
simple linear regression analysis, and normalized gain.&#13;
The research results indicate that: 1) the differentiated ADI learning model&#13;
has an effect on students’ scientific argumentation skills, as evidenced by a Sig. (2-&#13;
tailed) value of 0.000 &lt; 0.05, thus rejecting H₀ and accepting H₁. The magnitude of&#13;
the effect is indicated by an R-Square value of 0.803 or 80.3%; and 2) an increase&#13;
in students’ scientific argumentation skills in the experimental class of 20.67, or&#13;
42.11% in percentage terms. The scientific argumentation category improved from&#13;
“adequate” to “strong.” Based on these results, it can be concluded that the&#13;
differentiated ADI learning model has an effect on scientific argumentation skills&#13;
and is capable of improving students’ scientific argumentation skills regarding&#13;
global warming.</mods:abstract><mods:classification authority="lcc">371.36 Metode Pengajaran, Metode Pembelajaran</mods:classification><mods:originInfo><mods:dateIssued encoding="iso8061">2026-05-18</mods:dateIssued></mods:originInfo><mods:originInfo><mods:publisher>UIN SUNAN KALIJAGA YOGYAKARTA;FAKULTAS ILMU TARBIYAH DAN KEGURUAN</mods:publisher></mods:originInfo><mods:genre>Thesis</mods:genre></mods:mods>