<mods:mods version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" xmlns:mods="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"><mods:titleInfo><mods:title>PERBANDINGAN METODE LONG SHORT-TERM MEMORY (LSTM) DAN GATED RECURRENT UNIT (GRU) DENGAN PENDEKATAN UNIVARIAT DAN MULTIVARIAT UNTUK MEMPREDIKSI HARGA SAHAM (STUDI KASUS : HARGA SAHAM BMRI PERIODE 2015-2024)</mods:title></mods:titleInfo><mods:name type="personal"><mods:namePart type="given">NIM.: 22106010003</mods:namePart><mods:namePart type="family">Amanda Riyas Utami</mods:namePart><mods:role><mods:roleTerm type="text">author</mods:roleTerm></mods:role></mods:name><mods:abstract>A time series is a sequence of observations that are time-oriented or arranged&#13;
chronologically for an observed variable. Time series data are widely used&#13;
in analysis and forecasting, including stock price analysis. Stock price data are generally&#13;
non-stationary, fluctuating, highly volatile, and tend to form nonlinear patterns.&#13;
These characteristics cause the assumptions of classical time series methods,&#13;
particularly Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) and Gated Recurrent Unit (GRU),&#13;
which are used to predict stock prices using univariate and multivariate approaches.&#13;
The data used in this study were the stock price data of PT Bank Mandiri Tbk&#13;
(BMRI) from 2015 to 2024. The research stages included Exploratory Data Analysis&#13;
(EDA), preprocessing, modeling, and architecture optimization, with evaluation&#13;
conducted using Mean Squared Error (MSE) and Mean Absolute Error (MAE). The&#13;
results showed that both LSTM and GRU models with univariate and multivariate&#13;
approaches were able to predict stock prices with movements relatively similar to&#13;
the actual data. The univariate GRU model was identified as the best architecture&#13;
consisting of a sliding window of 30, one hidden layer, 128 units, dropout of 0.1,&#13;
batch size of 32, and MSE and MAE values of 0.0012 and 0.0270, respectively. In&#13;
addition, GRU demonstrated higher sensitivity than LSTM, resulting in more aggressive&#13;
predictions of price declines, while LSTM produced predictions that were&#13;
more realistic.</mods:abstract><mods:classification authority="lcc">515.6 Metode Analitik - Matematika</mods:classification><mods:originInfo><mods:dateIssued encoding="iso8061">2026-05-12</mods:dateIssued></mods:originInfo><mods:originInfo><mods:publisher>UIN SUNAN KALIJAGA YOGYAKARTA;FAKULTAS SAINS DAN TEKNOLOGI</mods:publisher></mods:originInfo><mods:genre>Thesis</mods:genre></mods:mods>