<mods:mods version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" xmlns:mods="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"><mods:titleInfo><mods:title>IDENTIFIKASI DAN ANALISIS RISIKO KECELAKAAN KERJA PADA PROSES PRODUKSI MENGGUNAKAN METODE HAZARD IDENTIFICATION AND RISK ASSESSMENT (HIRA) DAN HAZARD AND OPERABILITY STUDY (HAZOP) (STUDI KASUS: CV. JAGAL KAYU SEJAHTERA ABADI)</mods:title></mods:titleInfo><mods:name type="personal"><mods:namePart type="given">NIM.: 22106060045</mods:namePart><mods:namePart type="family">Dani Darmawan</mods:namePart><mods:role><mods:roleTerm type="text">author</mods:roleTerm></mods:role></mods:name><mods:abstract>CV. Jagal Kayu Sejahtera Abadi is a manufacturing company engaged in the&#13;
production of wooden tableware, kitchenware, and handicrafts using a make-toorder&#13;
production system. The complexity of the production process involving&#13;
machinery, wood materials, and manual work activities creates various potential&#13;
hazards that may lead to workplace accidents and disrupt production targets.&#13;
Therefore, systematic hazard identification, risk assessment, and risk control efforts&#13;
are required. This study aims to identify potential hazards, assess risk levels using&#13;
the Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment (HIRA) method, and provide risk&#13;
control recommendations through the Hazard and Operability Study (HAZOP)&#13;
method. Hazard validation was conducted using the Content Validity Ratio (CVR)&#13;
method based on assessments from five supervisor-level workers to ensure the&#13;
relevance of identified hazards. Risk levels were determined by combining severity&#13;
and likelihood values using a risk matrix. The results identified 19 validated hazard&#13;
sources, dominated by chemical hazards such as wood dust, sanding dust, coating&#13;
vapor exposure, and fire potential. The sanding process had the highest number of&#13;
hazard findings, while the shaping process showed the highest average risk score&#13;
of 20. Risk classification consisted of 16% extreme, 26% high, 42% moderate, and&#13;
16% low categories. Proposed risk controls included 10 substitution actions, 16&#13;
engineering controls, 19 administrative controls, and 15 uses of personal protective&#13;
equipment (PPE). Additional recommendations included occupational safety SOPs,&#13;
hazard posters, safety signs, work accident report sheets, and first aid kit standards&#13;
to support a safer working environment.</mods:abstract><mods:classification authority="lcc">670 Teknik Industri</mods:classification><mods:originInfo><mods:dateIssued encoding="iso8061">2026-05-25</mods:dateIssued></mods:originInfo><mods:originInfo><mods:publisher>UIN SUNAN KALIJAGA YOGYAKARTA;FAKULTAS SAINS DAN TEKNOLOGI</mods:publisher></mods:originInfo><mods:genre>Thesis</mods:genre></mods:mods>