<mods:mods version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" xmlns:mods="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"><mods:titleInfo><mods:title>PERAN MEDIATOR DALAM MENJAMIN HAK NAFKAH ANAK PADA PROSES MEDIASI DI PENGADILAN AGAMA KARANGANYAR TAHUN 2025</mods:title></mods:titleInfo><mods:name type="personal"><mods:namePart type="given">NIM.: 22103050037</mods:namePart><mods:namePart type="family">Ismail Ahmad Hamdan</mods:namePart><mods:role><mods:roleTerm type="text">author</mods:roleTerm></mods:role></mods:name><mods:abstract>Divorce not only severs the civil marital bond but frequently has a detrimental&#13;
impact on the neglect of children's rights, particularly regarding the fulfillment of&#13;
child maintenance (nafkah). At the Karanganyar Religious Court in 2025, the high&#13;
level of parental egoism and financial asymmetry practices (salary slip&#13;
manipulation) pose a serious threat to the survival of the descendants. When the&#13;
mediation process to reconcile the household (full success) reaches an impasse, the&#13;
Judge Mediator is required to act proactively in facilitating a "Partial Peace&#13;
Agreement" (Partial Success) to save the children's future. Therefore, this study&#13;
focuses on two main problems: describing the progressive strategy of the Judge&#13;
Mediator in guaranteeing child maintenance rights through partial agreements,&#13;
and analyzing the effectiveness of these strategies in overcoming sociological&#13;
inhibiting factors in the negotiation room.&#13;
This qualitative research employs a descriptive-analytical field research type.&#13;
Primary data collection was conducted through courtroom ethnography&#13;
observation and in-depth interviews carried out in three stages with Judge&#13;
Mediators at the Karanganyar Religious Court. This study specifically uses a&#13;
sociological approach to capture the actual working of law in society (law in&#13;
action). The field data obtained was then dissected using two main theoretical&#13;
frameworks: Role Theory to analyze the factual performance innovation of the&#13;
mediator, and Legal Protection Theory to evaluate the effectiveness of the court's&#13;
intervention as preventive and repressive instruments for the protection of children's&#13;
rights.&#13;
The results of the study conclude that the Judge Mediators at the Karanganyar&#13;
Religious Court do not work in a mechanically passive manner, but rather perform&#13;
highly effective role innovations. These progressive strategies include: (1)&#13;
optimizing reconvention lawsuits as an entry point for negotiation, (2) applying&#13;
administrative coercion in the form of suspending the divorce pledge (ikrar talak)&#13;
and withholding the Divorce Certificate (Akta Cerai) until the first maintenance&#13;
payment is settled as an anti-default guarantee, and (3) inserting a progressive&#13;
clause of a 10% annual increase in the maintenance percentage. The effectiveness&#13;
of this strategy is strongly supported by the authoritative prestige of the Deciding&#13;
Judge, who firmly educates on the threat of criminal sanctions for child neglect&#13;
(based on the Child Protection Law and the Penal Code). This sociological&#13;
intervention has proven effective in subduing internal obstacles in the form of&#13;
egoism and financial manipulation by the ex-husband, as well as eliminating&#13;
external obstacles such as provocative intervention from extended families and&#13;
legal counsels.</mods:abstract><mods:classification authority="lcc">346.01 Hukum Keluarga - Hukum Pernikahan</mods:classification><mods:originInfo><mods:dateIssued encoding="iso8061">2026-05-20</mods:dateIssued></mods:originInfo><mods:originInfo><mods:publisher>UIN SUNAN KALIJAGA YOGYAKARTA;FAKULTAS SYARIAH DAN HUKUM</mods:publisher></mods:originInfo><mods:genre>Thesis</mods:genre></mods:mods>