%0 Thesis
%9 Skripsi
%A M. Imam Muda Akdasuma Akbar, NIM.: 22103060031
%B FAKULTAS SYARIAH DAN HUKUM
%D 2026
%F digilib:76960
%I UIN SUNAN KALIJAGA YOGYAKARTA
%K Agama-Negara, Pemikiran Muhammad Husein Haikal, Pemikiran Thaha Husein Ali
%P 122
%T HUBUNGAN AGAMA DAN NEGARA PERSPEKTIF MUHAMMAD HUSEIN HAIKAL DAN THAHA HUSEIN ALI
%U https://digilib.uin-suka.ac.id/id/eprint/76960/
%X This study examines the relationship between religion and the state from  the perspectives of Muhammad Husein Haikal and Thaha Husein Ali. It focuses  on comparing the two figures’ views on this relationship, which often becomes a  point of contention when discussing systems of government—some favor a  democratic system, others a secular one, and still others a traditional monarchy.  This highlights the need to question the adaptation of laws and the reasons behind  the differing views of thinkers regarding the relationship between religion and the  state. This study aims to provide an in-depth description of the views of  Muhammad Husein Haikal and Thaha Husein Ali on the relationship between  religion and the state, analyze the intellectual trajectories of both figures, and  conduct a comparative analysis of their respective perspectives.  This is a qualitative study with a normative approach. Data was obtained  through a literature review of contemporary works, including political treatises  and other literary works. The theoretical framework used by the author in this  analysis is Abdul Wahhab Khallaf’s theory of political jurisprudence (fiqh siyasah)  and Munawir Sjadzali’s theory of the Religion-State Relationship Paradigm,  which can broaden our objective perspective on the relationship between religion  and the state.  The research findings indicate that Muhammad Husein Haikal and Thaha  Husein Ali hold differing views on the relationship between religion and the state;  Muhammad Husein Haikal advocates for a symbiotic relationship between the  two, as evidenced by his ideas. Meanwhile, according to Thaha Husein Ali, religion  and the state must be separated in order to achieve modern civilization, as attained  by Western nations, so his thinking is often categorized as secular. The difference  in opinion between these two figures stems from the challenges they faced, where  Muhammad Husein Haikal sought adaptation, while Thaha Husein Ali sought  revolution. Nevertheless, they agreed that Islam never dictates a specific form or  system of government, and that Islamic law must be dynamic so that it can respond  to the challenges of the times.
%Z Nurdhin Baroroh, S.H.I., M.S.I.