eprintid: 76961
rev_number: 11
eprint_status: archive
userid: 12460
dir: disk0/00/07/69/61
datestamp: 2026-06-23 01:35:09
lastmod: 2026-06-23 01:35:09
status_changed: 2026-06-23 01:35:09
type: thesis
metadata_visibility: show
contact_email: muh.khabib@uin-suka.ac.id
creators_name: Berlian Mustika Sary, NIM.: 22103060040
title: PERBANDINGAN PANDANGAN M. QURAISH SHIHAB DAN MICHAEL CHOLBI TERHADAP LEGALITAS EUTANASIA
ispublished: pub
subjects: 297.413
divisions: jur_pma
full_text_status: restricted
keywords: Eutanasia, Pemikiran M. Quraish Shihab, Pemikiran Michael Cholbi, Maqaṣid Asy-Syariʿah, Etika Sekuler
note: Shohibul Adhkar, M.H.
abstract: This study discusses the comparison between the views of M. Quraish Shihab
and Michael Cholbi regarding the legality of Eutanasia. The study is motivated by the
different foundations of Islamic law and secular ethics in understanding the right to
life, patient suffering, and human authority in determining the end of life. The purpose
of this research is to identify the reasons behind the differences in the two figures’
perspectives and to analyze the similarities and differences in their thoughts regarding
the legality of Eutanasia in modern society.
This research is a library research with a descriptive-comparative approach.
The methods used are normative approaches. Primary data sources were obtained from
the works of M. Quraish Shihab and Michael Cholbi, while secondary data were
collected from books, journals, and previous studies related to Eutanasia, Maqāṣid
Asy-Syarīʿah, and secular ethics. Data analysis was conducted using content analysis
with deductive and inductive reasoning methods.
The results show that M. Quraish Shihab rejects active Eutanasia because it
contradicts the principle of hifẓ an-nafs and the absolute authority of Allah SWT over
human life. However, in certain circumstances, the withdrawal of futile medical
treatment may still be considered permissible as passive Eutanasia. Meanwhile,
Michael Cholbi views Eutanasia as a form of respect for individual autonomy and an
effort to reduce the suffering of terminal patients, making it morally justifiable provided
that there is voluntary consent and strict procedures. The similarity between the two
figures lies in their concern for human dignity and patient suffering, while the
difference lies in the source of moral legitimacy they use. This study concludes that the
debate on the legality of Eutanasia is influenced by differences in epistemological
foundations between Islamic law, which emphasizes the protection of life, and secular
ethics, which prioritizes individual freedom.
date: 2026-06-03
date_type: published
pages: 100
institution: UIN SUNAN KALIJAGA YOGYAKARTA
department: FAKULTAS SYARIAH DAN HUKUM
thesis_type: skripsi
thesis_name: other
citation:   Berlian Mustika Sary, NIM.: 22103060040  (2026) PERBANDINGAN PANDANGAN M. QURAISH SHIHAB DAN MICHAEL CHOLBI TERHADAP LEGALITAS EUTANASIA.  Skripsi thesis, UIN SUNAN KALIJAGA YOGYAKARTA.   
document_url: https://digilib.uin-suka.ac.id/id/eprint/76961/1/22103060040_BAB-I_IV-atau-V_DAFTAR-PUSTAKA.pdf
document_url: https://digilib.uin-suka.ac.id/id/eprint/76961/2/22103060040_BAB-II_sampai_SEBELUM-BAB-TERAKHIR.pdf