eprintid: 76987
rev_number: 10
eprint_status: archive
userid: 12460
dir: disk0/00/07/69/87
datestamp: 2026-06-24 04:01:25
lastmod: 2026-06-24 04:01:25
status_changed: 2026-06-24 04:01:25
type: thesis
metadata_visibility: show
contact_email: muh.khabib@uin-suka.ac.id
creators_name: Annisa Supriyanti, NIM.: 22103080100
title: KEPASTIAN HUKUM MASA BERLAKU SERTIFIKAT HALAL TERHADAP JAMINAN PRODUK HALAL PASCA TERBITNYA PERATURAN PEMERINTAH NO. 42 TAHUN 2024 PADA UMK DI KABUPATEN SLEMAN
ispublished: pub
subjects: 341.7
divisions: ek_syariah
full_text_status: restricted
keywords: Kepastian Hukum, Sertifikat Halal, PP No 42 Tahun 2024, Pelaku
UMK
note: Dr. Diky Faqih Maulana, S.H., M.H.
abstract: Halal certification is mandatory to ensure that products circulating in the
market comply with the Halal Product Assurance System (Sistem Jaminan Produk
Halal/SJPH). The issuance of Government Regulation Number 42 of 2024 alters
the validity period of halal certificates from a fixed four-year term to a regime in
which certificates remain valid as long as there is no change in the composition of
ingredients and/or Halal Product Process (Proses Produk Halal/PPH). This policy
shift raises issues of legal certainty because it transfers self-monitoring
responsibilities to Micro and Small Enterprises (Usaha Mikro dan Kecil/UMK),
which generally face limited administrative capacity. In practice, this condition
may generate divergent interpretations regarding the obligation to report changes
and to renew halal certificates, and may ultimately affect the reliability of halal
assurance. Against this background, this study aims to analyze the legal certainty
of the validity period of halal certificates in relation to halal product assurance
after the enactment of Government Regulation Number 42 of 2024, focusing on
Micro and Small Enterprises (UMK) in Sleman Regency.
This research employs an empirical juridical method with a descriptiveanalytical
character, using a socio-legal and Islamic legal studies approach. The
data are drawn from primary legal materials in the form of relevant regulations and
from field data obtained through observation, documentation, and in-depth
interviews with UMK actors, and are then analyzed qualitatively. The analytical
framework is built upon the Theory of Legal Certainty and al-Syathibi’s Theory of
Maslahah.
The findings indicate that, from the perspective of the Theory of Legal
Certainty, Government Regulation Number 42 of 2024 normatively provides clearer
rules by shifting the validity of halal certificates from a periodic renewal system to
continuous validity based on the substantive condition of the product. Empirically,
however, legal certainty has not been fully realized due to the absence of clear
operational technical guidelines, which creates ambiguity and differing
understandings among UMK actors regarding post-certification reporting
obligations. From the perspective of al-Syathibi’s Theory of Maslahah, the policy
in principle fulfils aspects of daruriyah maslahah, particularly the protection of
religion (hifz al-din), life (hifz al-nafs), and property (hifz al-mal). Nevertheless, the
expected maslahah has not been optimally achieved because supervision remains
weak and business actors’ understanding of the applicable provisions is still limited.
date: 2026-06-02
date_type: published
pages: 169
institution: UIN SUNAN KALIJAGA YOGYAKARTA
department: FAKULTAS SYARIAH DAN HUKUM
thesis_type: skripsi
thesis_name: other
citation:   Annisa Supriyanti, NIM.: 22103080100  (2026) KEPASTIAN HUKUM MASA BERLAKU SERTIFIKAT HALAL TERHADAP JAMINAN PRODUK HALAL PASCA TERBITNYA PERATURAN PEMERINTAH NO. 42 TAHUN 2024 PADA UMK DI KABUPATEN SLEMAN.  Skripsi thesis, UIN SUNAN KALIJAGA YOGYAKARTA.   
document_url: https://digilib.uin-suka.ac.id/id/eprint/76987/1/22103080100_BAB-I_IV-atau-V_DAFTAR-PUSTAKA.pdf
document_url: https://digilib.uin-suka.ac.id/id/eprint/76987/2/22103080100_BAB-II_sampai_SEBELUM-BAB-TERAKHIR.pdf