<mods:mods version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" xmlns:mods="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"><mods:titleInfo><mods:title>IMPLEMENTASI PRINSIP TRANSPARANSI DAN PERLINDUNGAN HAK KHIYAR ‘AIB DALAM SISTEM DROPSHIPPING PADA PLATFORM SHOPEE DAN TIKTOK SHOP</mods:title></mods:titleInfo><mods:name type="personal"><mods:namePart type="given">NIM.: 24203011003</mods:namePart><mods:namePart type="family">Salma Naqiyya Fairuz Firaasya</mods:namePart><mods:role><mods:roleTerm type="text">author</mods:roleTerm></mods:role></mods:name><mods:abstract>The growth of e-commerce has given rise to the&#13;
dropshipping business model, in which dropshippers act as&#13;
intermediaries between suppliers and consumers without&#13;
physical control over the goods. This situation raises a&#13;
concerns: unverified product information potentially&#13;
constitutes garar, while consumers' right to khiyār 'aib is&#13;
difficult to fulfill due to procedural obstacles. This study aims&#13;
to analyze transparency practices and khiyār 'aib&#13;
implementation within the dropshipping system on the Shopee&#13;
and Tiktok Shop platforms through the perspective of John&#13;
Rawls' theory of justice and Imam Al-Syaṭibī's maqāṣid&#13;
syariah.&#13;
This study employs a descriptive-analytical,&#13;
normative empirical approach using qualitative methods.&#13;
Primary data were collected through semi-structured&#13;
interviews with three dropshippers and five consumers who&#13;
had experienced transaction losses. Secondary data was&#13;
sourced from the literature on fiqh mu'āmalah, theories of&#13;
justice, maqāṣid syariah, and regulations governing&#13;
electronic transactions.&#13;
The research results reveal three main findings. First,&#13;
product transparency is lacking because descriptions are&#13;
simply copied from suppliers without verification. Khiyār 'aib&#13;
is hindered by the unboxing requirement which lacks a formal regulatory basis for transfer methods, as well as the&#13;
dropshipper’s unresponsiveness and the opaque chain of&#13;
accountability for consumers. Second, Rawls' perspective&#13;
this system is deemed unfair as it violates the difference&#13;
principle since consumers as the most vulnerable party bear&#13;
the greatest risks without equivalent protection. Al-Syaṭibī's&#13;
maqāṣid perspective indicates that this system is valid at the&#13;
ḥājiyyah level, but undermines four dimensions of darūriyyah:&#13;
hifz al-dīn (potential for garar fahisy), hifz al-māl (material&#13;
loss without compensation and geographical discrimination&#13;
in return shopping costs), hifz al-nafs (non independent&#13;
safety verification), and hifz al-'aql (misleading promotional&#13;
content). Third, consumers serve as evidence of systemic&#13;
structural vulnerabilities within the dropshipping system.&#13;
This study recommends regulations for unboxing,&#13;
strengthening platform liability for dropshippers, and equal&#13;
consumer rights protection across of Indonesia.</mods:abstract><mods:classification authority="lcc">343.07 Hukum Ekonomi</mods:classification><mods:originInfo><mods:dateIssued encoding="iso8061">2026-06-08</mods:dateIssued></mods:originInfo><mods:originInfo><mods:publisher>UIN SUNAN KALIJAGA YOGYAKARTA;FAKULTAS SYARIAH DAN HUKUM</mods:publisher></mods:originInfo><mods:genre>Thesis</mods:genre></mods:mods>