<mods:mods version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" xmlns:mods="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"><mods:titleInfo><mods:title>EPISTEMICIDE PADA EPISTEMOLOGI JAMAAH AOLIA PANGGANG, GUNUNGKIDUL</mods:title></mods:titleInfo><mods:name type="personal"><mods:namePart type="given">NIM.: 23205011015</mods:namePart><mods:namePart type="family">Faqih Helmi Maulana</mods:namePart><mods:role><mods:roleTerm type="text">author</mods:roleTerm></mods:role></mods:name><mods:abstract>This research originates from the pluralistic socio-religious landscape of&#13;
Gunungkidul, where the epistemology of the Jamaah Aolia—rooted in direct&#13;
spiritual experience and the authority of the mursyid—is frequently dismissed as&#13;
illegitimate when confronted by mainstream Islam. Within this context, the study&#13;
highlights how epistemicide functions as a process of epistemic delegitimation that&#13;
potentially “extinguishes” a community’s social way of knowing. The research&#13;
aims to reveal the forms and characteristics of Jamaah Aolia’s epistemology in&#13;
Panggang, Gunungkidul, while explaining the mechanisms of epistemicide,&#13;
including marginalization and the community’s struggle for legitimacy.&#13;
The study employs a qualitative approach using a philosophical&#13;
ethnographic case study to understand the meanings, structures of epistemological&#13;
consciousness, and the “living world of knowledge” within the Jamaah Aolia.&#13;
Informants were selected via purposive sampling until data saturation was reached,&#13;
including members, the central figure (mursyid), and external religious or&#13;
community leaders. Primary data were gathered through semi-structured in-depth&#13;
interviews, limited participant observation, and field notes. Secondary data&#13;
included media documentation, religious archives, and official statements from&#13;
authorities. Data analysis followed the interactive model of Miles, Huberman, and&#13;
Saldaña, involving data reduction, data display, and conclusion&#13;
drawing/verification, supported by trustworthiness strategies such as triangulation&#13;
and member checking.&#13;
The results indicate that the epistemology of Jamaah Aolia is&#13;
foundationalist–‘irfānī–pragmatic in nature. It rests on the foundational authority&#13;
of the mursyid, is validated affectively through the concepts of “ati cocok” and&#13;
“mantep”, and is affirmed by its transformative impact on inner peace, moral&#13;
character (akhlak), and social harmony. Repeated rituals serve as the medium for&#13;
internalizing this knowledge. The study finds that epistemicide operates gradually&#13;
through labeling and discursive framing, the delegitimation of local authority, and&#13;
social marginalization—sustained by a dispositif of state, religion, and media.&#13;
Consequently, the Aolia way of knowing is pushed into the private sphere, leaving&#13;
it vulnerable to a narrowing of practice and a rupture in the transmission of&#13;
knowledge. Ultimately, the case of Jamaah Aolia underscores that epistemicide can&#13;
occur within intra-religious epistemic hierarchies. Thus, fostering spaces for&#13;
dialogue and more inclusive religious policies is essential to achieve cognitive&#13;
justice for local Islamic epistemologies.</mods:abstract><mods:classification authority="lcc">297.2 Teologi Islam, Aqidah dan Ilmu Kalam</mods:classification><mods:originInfo><mods:dateIssued encoding="iso8061">2026-01-28</mods:dateIssued></mods:originInfo><mods:originInfo><mods:publisher>UIN SUNAN KALIJAGA YOGYAKARTA;FAKULTAS USHULUDDIN DAN PEMIKIRAN ISLAM</mods:publisher></mods:originInfo><mods:genre>Thesis</mods:genre></mods:mods>