Institutional Repository UIN Sunan Kalijaga YogyakartaHADIS ḌA’IF DALAM PRAKTIK KEAGAMAAN: ANALISIS PEMIKIRAN YUSUF AL-QARDAWI DAN ‘ALI JUM’AH TERHADAP TRADISI YĀSINANNIM.: 21105050094Ahmad Faza FauzanauthorThis research comparatively examines the thought of Yūsuf al-Qarḍāwī and ‘Alī Jum’ah regarding the status of weak (ḍa‘īf) hadith as a valid source of evidence (hujjah) in Islamic law. The study departs from the classical scholarly debates concerning the legitimacy of employing weak hadith, particularly within the domains of practical jurisprudence, ethics, the merits of religious actions (faḍā’il al-a’māl), and the establishment of legal rulings. Using a qualitative methodology based on library research, the author analyzes the primary works of both scholars, particularly Yūsuf al-Qarḍāwī Kaifa Nata’āmal ma‘a al-Sunnah al-Nabawiyyah and ‘Alī Jum’ah Al-Bayān limā Yusyghil al-Adzhān, in addition to various relevant lectures, legal opinions (fatwa) and scholarly writings concerning the use of weak hadith. The findings reveal that both Al-Qarḍāwīand ‘Alī Jum’ah acknowledge the admissibility of weak hadith, yet differ in scope and interpretive criteria. Al-Qaradawi permits the use of weak hadith exclusively in the context of Faḍāʾil al-A’māl, spiritual motivation, and matters unrelated to the establishment of binding legal rulings, provided that the degree of weakness is not severe and the content is supported by stronger Syarī’ah principles. ‘Alī Jum’ah, on the other hand, presents a broader legitimization of weak hadith, even within certain areas of secondary jurisprudential rulings (furū’), as long as the hadith does not contradict stronger evidence and is supported by classical scholarly tradition. He emphasizes the authority of transmission chains sustained by historical scholarly practice and the continuity of acceptance across intellectual traditions. This comparison shows that Al-Qarḍāwītends to be more selective and methodological, while ‘Alī Jum’ah is more inclusive and traditional in positioning weak hadith as a hujjah. This study produces findings that contribute to the development of contemporary hadith study methodology and enrich the epistemology of Islamic law by presenting two major approaches: the reformist approach and the traditional approach.297.21 Ilmu Hadis2026-04-09UIN SUNAN KALIJAGA YOGYAKARTA;FAKULTAS USHULUDDIN DAN PEMIKIRAN ISLAMThesis

For work being deposited by its own author: In self-archiving this collection of files and associated bibliographic metadata, I grant Institutional Repository UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta the right to store them and to make them permanently available publicly for free on-line. I declare that this material is my own intellectual property and I understand that Institutional Repository UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta does not assume any responsibility if there is any breach of copyright in distributing these files or metadata. (All authors are urged to prominently assert their copyright on the title page of their work.)

For work being deposited by someone other than its author: I hereby declare that the collection of files and associated bibliographic metadata that I am archiving at Institutional Repository UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta) is in the public domain. If this is not the case, I accept full responsibility for any breach of copyright that distributing these files or metadata may entail.

Clicking on the deposit button indicates your agreement to these terms.