The repository administrator has not yet configured an RDF license.
HADIS ḌA’IF DALAM PRAKTIK KEAGAMAAN: ANALISIS PEMIKIRAN YUSUF AL-QARDAWI DAN ‘ALI JUM’AH TERHADAP TRADISI YĀSINAN
This research comparatively examines the thought of Yūsuf al-Qarḍāwī and ‘Alī Jum’ah regarding the status of weak (ḍa‘īf) hadith as a valid source of evidence (hujjah) in Islamic law. The study departs from the classical scholarly debates concerning the legitimacy of employing weak hadith, particularly within the domains of practical jurisprudence, ethics, the merits of religious actions (faḍā’il al-a’māl), and the establishment of legal rulings. Using a qualitative methodology based on library research, the author analyzes the primary works of both scholars, particularly Yūsuf al-Qarḍāwī Kaifa Nata’āmal ma‘a al-Sunnah al-Nabawiyyah and ‘Alī Jum’ah Al-Bayān limā Yusyghil al-Adzhān, in addition to various relevant lectures, legal opinions (fatwa) and scholarly writings concerning the use of weak hadith. The findings reveal that both Al-Qarḍāwīand ‘Alī Jum’ah acknowledge the admissibility of weak hadith, yet differ in scope and interpretive criteria. Al-Qaradawi permits the use of weak hadith exclusively in the context of Faḍāʾil al-A’māl, spiritual motivation, and matters unrelated to the establishment of binding legal rulings, provided that the degree of weakness is not severe and the content is supported by stronger Syarī’ah principles. ‘Alī Jum’ah, on the other hand, presents a broader legitimization of weak hadith, even within certain areas of secondary jurisprudential rulings (furū’), as long as the hadith does not contradict stronger evidence and is supported by classical scholarly tradition. He emphasizes the authority of transmission chains sustained by historical scholarly practice and the continuity of acceptance across intellectual traditions. This comparison shows that Al-Qarḍāwītends to be more selective and methodological, while ‘Alī Jum’ah is more inclusive and traditional in positioning weak hadith as a hujjah. This study produces findings that contribute to the development of contemporary hadith study methodology and enrich the epistemology of Islamic law by presenting two major approaches: the reformist approach and the traditional approach.
FAKULTAS USHULUDDIN DAN PEMIKIRAN ISLAM, UIN SUNAN KALIJAGA YOGYAKARTA
HADIS ḌA’IF DALAM PRAKTIK KEAGAMAAN: ANALISIS PEMIKIRAN YUSUF AL-QARDAWI DAN ‘ALI JUM’AH TERHADAP TRADISI YĀSINAN (Text)
HADIS ḌA’IF DALAM PRAKTIK KEAGAMAAN: ANALISIS PEMIKIRAN YUSUF AL-QARDAWI DAN ‘ALI JUM’AH TERHADAP TRADISI YĀSINAN (Other)
HTML Summary of #77484 HADIS ḌA’IF DALAM PRAKTIK KEAGAMAAN: ANALISIS PEMIKIRAN YUSUF AL-QARDAWI DAN ‘ALI JUM’AH TERHADAP TRADISI YĀSINAN