<mods:mods version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" xmlns:mods="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"><mods:titleInfo><mods:title>Penetapan Ganti Rugi dalam Perkara Perbuatan Melawan Hukum Perspektif Hukum Islam (Analisis atas Putusan Pengadilan Agama Yogyakarta</mods:title></mods:titleInfo><mods:name type="personal"><mods:namePart type="given">-</mods:namePart><mods:namePart type="family">Zaqil Widad</mods:namePart><mods:role><mods:roleTerm type="text">author</mods:roleTerm></mods:role></mods:name><mods:name type="personal"><mods:namePart type="given">-</mods:namePart><mods:namePart type="family">Siti Djazimah</mods:namePart><mods:role><mods:roleTerm type="text">author</mods:roleTerm></mods:role></mods:name><mods:abstract>The laws and regulations regarding the determination of compensation for&#13;
unlawful acts are very limited, so that in practice, judges in religious courts often&#13;
carry out ijtihad. This article discusses the legal reasoning of judges at the&#13;
Yogyakarta Religious Court in deciding cases of compensation due to unlawful&#13;
acts. The study focuses on the discussion of the Decision of Case Number:&#13;
84/Pdt.G/2019/PA.Yk., in which the judge granted the Plaintiff's claim for&#13;
compensation for the Defendant's unlawful act of closing the BTN Syariah Savings&#13;
account. In addition to using a juridical-normative approach, the author also&#13;
conducted a literature study and interviews. As a result, the judges decided the case&#13;
based on the law, legal doctrine, and facts revealed in court. This decision is in&#13;
accordance with the principles of legal discovery and Islamic legal principles,&#13;
especially maqasid asy-syariah and the principle of al-'adalah (justice).&#13;
Peraturan perundang-undangan terkait penetapan ganti rugi akibat perbuatan&#13;
melawan hukum sangat terbatas, sehingga dalam prakteknya para hakim di&#13;
pengadilan agama banyak melakukan ijtihad. Artikel ini mebahas nalar hukum&#13;
para hakim di Pengadilan Agama Yogyakarta dalam memutus perkara ganti rugi&#13;
akibat perbuatan melawan hukum. Kajian difokuskan pada pembahasan atas&#13;
Putusan Perkara Nomor: 84/Pdt.G/2019/PA.Yk., di mana hakim mengabulkan&#13;
tuntutan ganti rugi Penggugat terhadap perbuatan melawan hukum Tergugat&#13;
dalam menutup buku Tabungan BTN Syariah. Selain memakai pendekatan yuridisnormatif,&#13;
Penulis juga melakukan studi kepustakaan dan wawancara. Hasilnya,&#13;
para hakim memutus perkara berdasarkan pada undang-undang, doktrin hukum,&#13;
dan fakta-fakta yang terungkap di persidangan. Putusan ini sesuai dengan prinsip&#13;
penemuan hukum dan prinsip hukum Islam terutama maqasid asy-syariah dan&#13;
prinsip al-‘adalah (keadilan).</mods:abstract><mods:classification authority="lcc">297.4 Hukum Islam</mods:classification><mods:originInfo><mods:dateIssued encoding="iso8061">2026</mods:dateIssued></mods:originInfo><mods:originInfo><mods:publisher>Program STudi Hukum Keluarga Islam Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum</mods:publisher></mods:originInfo><mods:genre>Monograph</mods:genre></mods:mods>