{
      "department": "FAKULTAS SYARI’AH DAN HUKUM",
      "subjects": [
        347.07
      ],
      "eprintid": 77710,
      "thesis_type": "skripsi",
      "date": "2026-06-22",
      "userid": 12460,
      "documents": [
          {
            "language": "id",
            "placement": 1,
            "eprintid": 77710,
            "files": [
                {
                  "hash_type": "MD5",
                  "mtime": "2026-07-29 02:09:17",
                  "datasetid": "document",
                  "fileid": 1853240,
                  "objectid": 1068762,
                  "uri": "http:\/\/digilib.uin-suka.ac.id\/id\/file\/1853240",
                  "mime_type": "application\/pdf",
                  "hash": "a33fc69a313b5a9641546b3dc6376594",
                  "filesize": 9323366,
                  "filename": "22103050132_BAB-I_IV-atau-V_DAFTAR-PUSTAKA.pdf"
                }
            ],
            "content": "published",
            "rev_number": 3,
            "uri": "http:\/\/digilib.uin-suka.ac.id\/id\/document\/1068762",
            "main": "22103050132_BAB-I_IV-atau-V_DAFTAR-PUSTAKA.pdf",
            "mime_type": "application\/pdf",
            "docid": 1068762,
            "format": "text",
            "security": "public",
            "pos": 1,
            "formatdesc": "ANALISIS YURIDIS PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM DALAM MENETAPKAN HAK ASUH ANAK KEPADA AYAH (STUDI PUTUSAN PENGADILAN AGAMA BALIKPAPAN NOMOR XXX\/XXX\/XXX\/PA.Bpp)"
          },
          {
            "language": "id",
            "placement": 2,
            "eprintid": 77710,
            "files": [
                {
                  "hash_type": "MD5",
                  "mtime": "2026-07-29 02:09:19",
                  "datasetid": "document",
                  "fileid": 1853243,
                  "objectid": 1068763,
                  "uri": "http:\/\/digilib.uin-suka.ac.id\/id\/file\/1853243",
                  "mime_type": "application\/pdf",
                  "hash": "00726dfe68e27f306d3a3f097d773531",
                  "filesize": 8280840,
                  "filename": "22103050132_BAB-II_sampai_SEBELUM-BAB-TERAKHIR.pdf"
                }
            ],
            "content": "published",
            "rev_number": 3,
            "uri": "http:\/\/digilib.uin-suka.ac.id\/id\/document\/1068763",
            "main": "22103050132_BAB-II_sampai_SEBELUM-BAB-TERAKHIR.pdf",
            "mime_type": "application\/pdf",
            "docid": 1068763,
            "format": "text",
            "security": "validuser",
            "pos": 2,
            "formatdesc": "ANALISIS YURIDIS PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM DALAM MENETAPKAN HAK ASUH ANAK KEPADA AYAH (STUDI PUTUSAN PENGADILAN AGAMA BALIKPAPAN NOMOR XXX\/XXX\/XXX\/PA.Bpp)"
          }
      ],
      "rev_number": 10,
      "creators": [
        {
          "name": {
            "lineage": null,
            "given": "NIM.: 22103050132",
            "honourific": null,
            "family": "Muhammad Dzakwan Tsaqibulhanif"
          }
        }
      ],
      "dir": "disk0\/00\/07\/77\/10",
      "keywords": "Hak Asuh Anak, Hadhanah, Pertimbangan Hakim, Perlindungan Anak,\r\nThe Best Interests Of The Child",
      "lastmod": "2026-07-29 02:28:50",
      "ispublished": "pub",
      "metadata_visibility": "show",
      "date_type": "published",
      "eprint_status": "archive",
      "status_changed": "2026-07-29 02:28:50",
      "datestamp": "2026-07-29 02:28:50",
      "uri": "http:\/\/digilib.uin-suka.ac.id\/id\/eprint\/77710",
      "thesis_name": "other",
      "note": "Bustanul Arifien Rusydi, M.H.",
      "full_text_status": "restricted",
      "contact_email": "muh.khabib@uin-suka.ac.id",
      "divisions": [
        "HKI"
      ],
      "abstract": "Child custody (hadhanah) disputes following divorce constitute one of the\r\nmost significant issues in family law, requiring comprehensive judicial\r\nconsideration to ensure the protection and welfare of children. In principle, Article\r\n105 of the Compilation of Islamic Law grants priority custody rights to the mother\r\nfor children who have not yet reached the age of discernment (mumayyiz). However,\r\nin the Decision of the Balikpapan Religious Court Number\r\nXXX\/XXX\/XXX\/PA.Bpp, the panel of judges awarded custody to the father based\r\non the mother’s proven serious moral misconduct. This decision is noteworthy\r\nbecause it demonstrates a departure from the general legal provision in order to\r\npursue the child’s welfare and protection. This study aims to analyze the fulfillment\r\nof children's rights protection in the decision based on the Child Protection Law and\r\nto examine whether the judges’ reasoning is consistent with the principle of The\r\nBest Interests of the Child.\r\nThis research is a normative legal study employing both the statutory\r\napproach and the case approach. The primary legal source is the Decision of the\r\nBalikpapan Religious Court Number XXX\/XXX\/XXX\/PA.Bpp, while secondary\r\nsources consist of legislation, legal literature, academic journals, and other relevant\r\nreferences. The collected data were analyzed qualitatively using a deductive\r\nmethod.\r\nThe findings indicate that the panel of judges applied a rechtsvinding\r\napproach by prioritizing the protection of the child’s morality as the basis for\r\ntransferring custody to the father. The decision was grounded on facts established\r\nduring the trial, which proved the mother’s serious moral misconduct and its\r\npotential impact on the child’s developmental environment. From a child protection\r\nperspective, the decision may be viewed as a preventive measure to safeguard the\r\nchild’s moral, mental, and spiritual development. Nevertheless, when examined\r\nthrough the principle of The Best Interests of the Child, several critical issues\r\nremain. These include the child’s emotional attachment to the mother as the primary\r\ncaregiver, the father’s readiness to provide direct care despite his professional\r\ncommitments, the potential delegation of caregiving responsibilities to third parties,\r\nand the child’s right to maintain a healthy relationship with both parents. Therefore,\r\nwhile the decision fulfills the objective of protecting the child’s moral welfare, it\r\ndoes not fully satisfy the holistic implementation of the principle of the best\r\ninterests of the child, which encompasses physical, psychological, emotional,\r\nsocial, and spiritual well-being.",
      "type": "thesis",
      "title": "ANALISIS YURIDIS PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM DALAM MENETAPKAN HAK ASUH ANAK KEPADA AYAH (STUDI PUTUSAN PENGADILAN AGAMA BALIKPAPAN NOMOR XXX\/XXX\/XXX\/PA.Bpp)",
      "institution": "UIN SUNAN KALIJAGA YOGYAKARTA",
      "pages": 100
    }