@phdthesis{digilib77929,
           month = {June},
           title = {OPTIMALISASI PENGEMBALIAN UANG NEGARA HASIL TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI OLEH KEJAKSAAN TINGGI YOGYAKARTA},
          school = {UIN SUNAN KALIJAGA YOGYAKARTA},
          author = {NIM.: 21103040020 Seroja Dinda Nirwana},
            year = {2026},
            note = {Gilang Kresnanda Annas S.H., M.H.},
        keywords = {Tindak Pidana Korupsi, Pengembalian Uang Negara, Kejaksaan},
             url = {https://digilib.uin-suka.ac.id/id/eprint/77929/},
        abstract = {This study aims to analyze the optimization of the return of state losses due
to corruption crimes by the Yogyakarta Special Region High Prosecutor's Office
and identify the factors that affect its effectiveness. The background of this research
is based on the existence of several cases of criminal acts that are not followed by
the payment of compensation by the perpetrator, thus causing problems in efforts
to recover state finances. This condition shows that the state as a victim has not
obtained recovery for the losses caused, so it may reflect the ineffectiveness of the
state's compensation mechanism in law enforcement practices.
The research method used was empirical juridical with data collection
through interviews at the Yogyakarta Special Region High Prosecutor's Office and
literature studies. Data analysis was carried out qualitatively by examining the
relationship between normative provisions and their implementation in the practice
of state refunds at the Yogyakarta Special Region High Prosecutor's Office.
The results of the study show that the optimization of state loss returns has
not been achieved optimally, due to several factors, including limitations in asset
tracing, limited economic capabilities of perpetrators, and disparities between
prosecutors' demands and judges' decisions in imposing additional penalties for
substitute money and subsidiary imprisonment. The optimization of state refunds is
influenced by legal substance factors, law enforcement factors, facilities and
facilities, as well as community factors and legal culture. Therefore, the
effectiveness of recovering state losses does not only depend on the applicable legal
norms, but also on the professionalism of law enforcement officials, adequate
facility support, and public legal awareness in supporting the eradication of
corruption. The conclusion of this study is that the regulation of subsidiary prison
sentences needs to be evaluated and strengthened with a more optimal asset
recovery mechanism, and efforts are needed to minimize the disparity between the
judge's decision and the prosecutor's demands through the preparation of more
targeted guidelines for judges in imposing additional penalties and strengthening
the prosecutor's arguments in formulating demands, so as to support the
optimization of state losses more effective.}
}