Institutional Repository UIN Sunan Kalijaga YogyakartaPEMENUHAN HAK KORBAN PELANGGARAN HAM BERAT 1965–1966 DALAM KERANGKA HUKUM POSITIFNIM.: 21103040089Yudhistira Wahyu PradanaauthorThe gross human rights violations of 1965–1966 constitute crimes against humanity. This has led to the fulfillment of the rights of the victims in accordance with the mandate of Act Number 26 of 2000 (the Human Rights Court Act). Meanwhile, the practice of fulfilling the rights of victims of the 1965–1966 Gross Human Rights Violations still shows disparities, due to the absence of a judicial mechanism that has yet to be implemented. Therefore, this research seeks to examine further how the practice of fulfilling victim rights is carried out under the positive legal framework in Indonesia to provide and ensure a sense of justice for the victims. This research is a field research that collects data from interviews with relevant parties, such as the National Commission on Human Rights (Komnas HAM), Institution for the Protection of Witnesses and Victims (LPSK), and individual human rights activists, as primary data. In addition to primary data, this research also uses secondary data sources, including legal laws and the results of literature reviews on topics that are directly or indirectly related to the subject of this research. These two types of data will be analyzed using the concepts of transitional justice and state responsibility as the theoretical framework. The research findings point to two main conclusions. First, efforts to uphold the rights of victims of the 1965–1966 gross human rights violations still reveal a gap between positive law specifically the mandate of the Human Rights Court Act, and the reality on the ground, due to a deadlock in judicial mechanisms. This deadlock stems from differing understandings between Komnas HAM as the investigator authority and the Kejaksaan Agung as the invesgating officer authority. Other factors include the prevalence of impunity and the lack of political will among policymakers to establish an human rights court. Second, from a transitional justice perspective, the state’s current efforts remain trapped in a pragmatic approach. In transitional justice terminology, the right to justice and truth should be realized first through judicial mechanisms before the right to reparations is granted. So far, the Indonesian government has instead prioritized the fulfillment of reparations, which are provided through medical assistance and rehabilitation by the LPSK. However, the practice of providing such assistance is often hindered by binding administrative regulations and the LPSK’s budget limitations.340 Ilmu Hukum2026-06-04UIN SUNAN KALIJAGA YOGYAKARTA;FAKULTAS SYARI’AH DAN HUKUMThesis

For work being deposited by its own author: In self-archiving this collection of files and associated bibliographic metadata, I grant Institutional Repository UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta the right to store them and to make them permanently available publicly for free on-line. I declare that this material is my own intellectual property and I understand that Institutional Repository UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta does not assume any responsibility if there is any breach of copyright in distributing these files or metadata. (All authors are urged to prominently assert their copyright on the title page of their work.)

For work being deposited by someone other than its author: I hereby declare that the collection of files and associated bibliographic metadata that I am archiving at Institutional Repository UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta) is in the public domain. If this is not the case, I accept full responsibility for any breach of copyright that distributing these files or metadata may entail.

Clicking on the deposit button indicates your agreement to these terms.