@prefix epid: .
@prefix void: .
@prefix xsd: .
@prefix cc: .
@prefix ep: .
@prefix eprel: .
@prefix dc: .
@prefix bibo: .
@prefix geo: .
@prefix owl: .
@prefix event: .
@prefix skos: .
@prefix foaf: .
@prefix rdfs: .
@prefix rdf: .
@prefix dct: .
<>
foaf:primaryTopic ;
rdfs:comment "The repository administrator has not yet configured an RDF license."^^xsd:string .
dct:hasPart ;
ep:hasFile ;
rdf:type bibo:Document,
ep:Document;
rdfs:label "PEMBAGIAN HARTA BERSAMA (STUDI KOMPARASI PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG NO. 288 K/AG/2010 DENGAN PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG NO. 266 K/AG/2010) (Text)"^^xsd:string .
rdf:type bibo:Document,
ep:Document;
rdfs:label "PEMBAGIAN HARTA BERSAMA (STUDI KOMPARASI PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG NO. 288 K/AG/2010 DENGAN PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG NO. 266 K/AG/2010) (Text)"^^xsd:string .
eprel:isVersionOf ;
eprel:isVolatileVersionOf ;
eprel:islightboxThumbnailVersionOf ;
rdf:type ep:Document;
rdfs:label "PEMBAGIAN HARTA BERSAMA (STUDI KOMPARASI PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG NO. 288 K/AG/2010 DENGAN PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG NO. 266 K/AG/2010) (Other)"^^xsd:string .
eprel:isVersionOf ;
eprel:isVolatileVersionOf ;
eprel:ispreviewThumbnailVersionOf ;
rdf:type ep:Document;
rdfs:label "PEMBAGIAN HARTA BERSAMA (STUDI KOMPARASI PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG NO. 288 K/AG/2010 DENGAN PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG NO. 266 K/AG/2010) (Other)"^^xsd:string .
eprel:isVersionOf ;
eprel:isVolatileVersionOf ;
eprel:ismediumThumbnailVersionOf ;
rdf:type ep:Document;
rdfs:label "PEMBAGIAN HARTA BERSAMA (STUDI KOMPARASI PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG NO. 288 K/AG/2010 DENGAN PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG NO. 266 K/AG/2010) (Other)"^^xsd:string .
eprel:isVersionOf ;
eprel:isVolatileVersionOf ;
eprel:issmallThumbnailVersionOf ;
rdf:type ep:Document;
rdfs:label "PEMBAGIAN HARTA BERSAMA (STUDI KOMPARASI PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG NO. 288 K/AG/2010 DENGAN PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG NO. 266 K/AG/2010) (Other)"^^xsd:string .
dct:hasPart ;
ep:hasFile ;
eprel:isVersionOf ;
eprel:isVolatileVersionOf ;
eprel:islightboxThumbnailVersionOf ;
rdf:type ep:Document;
rdfs:label "PEMBAGIAN HARTA BERSAMA (STUDI KOMPARASI PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG NO. 288 K/AG/2010 DENGAN PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG NO. 266 K/AG/2010) (Other)"^^xsd:string .
dct:hasPart ;
ep:hasFile ;
eprel:isVersionOf ;
eprel:isVolatileVersionOf ;
eprel:ispreviewThumbnailVersionOf ;
rdf:type ep:Document;
rdfs:label "PEMBAGIAN HARTA BERSAMA (STUDI KOMPARASI PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG NO. 288 K/AG/2010 DENGAN PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG NO. 266 K/AG/2010) (Other)"^^xsd:string .
dct:hasPart ;
ep:hasFile ;
eprel:isVersionOf ;
eprel:isVolatileVersionOf ;
eprel:ismediumThumbnailVersionOf ;
rdf:type ep:Document;
rdfs:label "PEMBAGIAN HARTA BERSAMA (STUDI KOMPARASI PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG NO. 288 K/AG/2010 DENGAN PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG NO. 266 K/AG/2010) (Other)"^^xsd:string .
dct:hasPart ;
ep:hasFile ;
eprel:isVersionOf ;
eprel:isVolatileVersionOf ;
eprel:issmallThumbnailVersionOf ;
rdf:type ep:Document;
rdfs:label "PEMBAGIAN HARTA BERSAMA (STUDI KOMPARASI PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG NO. 288 K/AG/2010 DENGAN PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG NO. 266 K/AG/2010) (Other)"^^xsd:string .
rdf:_1 .
bibo:abstract "This study is motivated by differences in legal interpretation in the division of\r\nmarital property after divorce in Indonesia. Although it has been regulated under\r\nLaw Number 1 of 1974 and the Compilation of Islamic Law (KHI), judicial\r\npractice shows inconsistencies, particularly in Supreme Court Decisions No. 288\r\nK/AG/2010 and No. 266 K/AG/2010. These differences lie in how judges interpret\r\nArticle 97 of the KHI, namely whether the division must be carried out equally or\r\ncan be adjusted based on the contributions of the parties. This situation raises\r\nissues concerning fairness in the distribution of joint assets after divorce, thus\r\nnecessitating a comparative study to understand the legal reasoning behind the\r\njudges’ considerations in both decisions.\r\nThis research employs a normative legal research method with a comparative\r\njuridical approach. The nature of the research is descriptive-analytical and\r\ncomparative, aiming to describe and analyze legal provisions concerning joint\r\nproperty and their application in Supreme Court decisions. The data used consist\r\nof primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials, which are analyzed\r\nqualitatively through a normative juridical approach. This study focuses on\r\ncomparing Decision No. 288 K/AG/2010 and No. 266 K/AG/2010 to assess the\r\nconsistency of legal application and its conformity with principles of justice.\r\nThe results of the study indicate that there are two different approaches to the\r\ndivision of joint assets. Decision No. 288 K/AG/2010 emphasizes legal certainty\r\nthrough equal division (½ : ½) after deducting joint debts, while Decision No. 266\r\nK/AG/2010 prioritizes substantive justice by considering the contributions of the\r\nparties, resulting in an unequal division (¾ for the wife and ¼ for the husband).\r\nThis difference demonstrates that the two decisions are not contradictory, but\r\nrather reflect the application of different concepts of justice, namely formal justice\r\nand proportional justice, in accordance with the circumstances of each case."^^xsd:string;
bibo:authorList ;
bibo:status ;
dc:hasVersion ,
;
dct:creator ;
dct:date "2026-08-10";
dct:isPartOf ;
dct:issuer ,
;
dct:subject ;
dct:title "PEMBAGIAN HARTA BERSAMA (STUDI KOMPARASI PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG NO. 288 K/AG/2010 DENGAN PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG NO. 266 K/AG/2010)"^^xsd:string;
ep:hasDocument ,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
;
ep:hasPublished ,
;
rdf:type bibo:Article,
bibo:Thesis,
ep:EPrint,
ep:ThesisEPrint;
rdfs:seeAlso .
rdf:type skos:Concept;
skos:prefLabel "340.2 Hukum Perbandingan" .
rdfs:label "19103060069_BAB-I_IV-atau-V_DAFTAR-PUSTAKA.pdf"^^xsd:string .
rdfs:label "lightbox.jpg"^^xsd:string .
rdfs:label "preview.jpg"^^xsd:string .
rdfs:label "medium.jpg"^^xsd:string .
rdfs:label "small.jpg"^^xsd:string .
dc:format "text/html";
dc:title "HTML Summary of #77950 \n\nPEMBAGIAN HARTA BERSAMA (STUDI KOMPARASI PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG NO. 288 K/AG/2010 DENGAN PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG NO. 266 K/AG/2010)\n\n";
foaf:primaryTopic .
dct:hasPart ;
foaf:name "UIN SUNAN KALIJAGA YOGYAKARTA"^^xsd:string;
rdf:type foaf:Organization .
dct:isPartOf ;
foaf:name "FAKULTAS SYARI’AH DAN HUKUM, UIN SUNAN KALIJAGA YOGYAKARTA"^^xsd:string;
rdf:type foaf:Organization .
foaf:familyName "Rizki Mutiara Bahari"^^xsd:string;
foaf:givenName "NIM.: 19103060069"^^xsd:string;
foaf:name "NIM.: 19103060069 Rizki Mutiara Bahari"^^xsd:string;
rdf:type foaf:Person .