http://digilib.uin-suka.ac.id/id/eprint/77953 2026-09-03T03:37:57Z info:eu-repo/semantics/descriptiveMetadata https://digilib.uin-suka.ac.id/id/eprint/77953/ DUALI SME KRIMINALI S AS I KESUS I LAAN DI INDONE S IA: ANALISIS PERBANDINGAN PASAL 412 UU No. 1/2023 KOHABITASI DAN PASAL 23 QANUN ACEH No. 6/2014 TENTANG KHALWAT Mokhammad Zulfikar Karim, NIM.: 22103060061 340.2 Hukum Perbandingan The phenomenon of cohabitation in Indonesia reflects changes in patterns of social relations influenced by the development of modern culture, globalization, and shifting moral values within society. The practice of living together without a legally recognized marriage bond not only raises moral and social issues, but also gives rise to differences in legal approaches within the Indonesian legal system. These differences can be seen in Article 412 of Law Number 1 of 2023, which regulates cohabitation as a complaint-based offense, and Article 23 of Aceh Qanun Number 6 of 2014 concerning Jinayat Law, which regulates khalwat as a jarimah that may be directly prosecuted by sharia law enforcement officers. This study aims to analyze the comparison of juridical structures, criminal elements, law enforcement mechanisms, and the authority of law enforcement officials in addressing cohabitation and khalwat based on Satjipto Rahardjo’s theory of comparative law. This study employs a qualitative research method using a normative juridical approach and library research. The nature of this research is descriptive, analytical, and comparative. Primary data sources were obtained from Article 412 of Law Number 1 of 2023 and Article 23 of Aceh Qanun Number 6 of 2014, while secondary data were obtained from books, journals, articles, and relevant scholarly works. Data collection techniques were conducted through library research and analyzed using comparative law theory. The results of this study indicate that a comparison of Article 412 of Law No. 1 of 2023 on cohabitation and Article 23 of the Aceh Qanun No. 6 of 2014 on khalwat reveals a dualism in the criminalization of immoral acts within the Indonesian legal system, influenced by differences in legal structure, social values, and the orientation of norm-setting. At the level of normative construction, a clear distinction is evident: cohabitation under the national Criminal Code is framed as an absolute complaint-based offense aimed at protecting the private sphere and limiting state intervention, whereas khalwat under the Aceh Qanun is constructed as a public offense based on Islamic sharia law, featuring more active, preventive, and extensive enforcement mechanisms. From the perspective of comparative law theory as a means of social control, as proposed by Satjipto Rahardjo, both provisions serve to maintain social order and morality through criminal law instruments and the involvement of law enforcement officials. From the perspective of comparative law theory, this difference indicates that the criminalization of immorality in the Indonesian legal system is not uniform but manifests in two distinct approaches that reflect a dualism within positive law. 2026-06-12 Thesis NonPeerReviewed text id https://digilib.uin-suka.ac.id/id/eprint/77953/1/22103060061_BAB-I_IV-atau-V_DAFTAR-PUSTAKA.pdf text id https://digilib.uin-suka.ac.id/id/eprint/77953/2/22103060061_BAB-II_sampai_SEBELUM-BAB-TERAKHIR.pdf Mokhammad Zulfikar Karim, NIM.: 22103060061 (2026) DUALI SME KRIMINALI S AS I KESUS I LAAN DI INDONE S IA: ANALISIS PERBANDINGAN PASAL 412 UU No. 1/2023 KOHABITASI DAN PASAL 23 QANUN ACEH No. 6/2014 TENTANG KHALWAT. Skripsi thesis, UIN SUNAN KALIJAGA YOGYAKARTA. info:eu-repo/semantics/objectFile info:eu-repo/semantics/objectFile info:eu-repo/semantics/humanStartPage