<mods:mods version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" xmlns:mods="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"><mods:titleInfo><mods:title>MITIGASI RISIKO TRANSAKSI JUAL BELI MELALUI PLATFORM FACEBOOK MARKETPLACE DALAM PERSPEKTIF FATWA DSN-MUI TENTANG JUAL BELI BERDASARKAN PRINSIP SYARI’AH</mods:title></mods:titleInfo><mods:name type="personal"><mods:namePart type="given">NIM.: 22103080065</mods:namePart><mods:namePart type="family">Sabdo Gallih Jati</mods:namePart><mods:role><mods:roleTerm type="text">author</mods:roleTerm></mods:role></mods:name><mods:abstract>Risk mitigation in digital transactions has become a critical issue alongside&#13;
the widespread use of Facebook Marketplace as a trading platform, despite the&#13;
platform's lack of formal consumer protection mechanisms such as escrow, seller&#13;
verification, or dispute resolution systems. This study aims to analyze the legal&#13;
status of Facebook Marketplace as an electronic trading platform, analyze the&#13;
practice of buying and selling transactions on Facebook Marketplace from the&#13;
perspective of DSN-MUI Fatwas, and evaluate the effectiveness of these fatwas as&#13;
a risk mitigation instruments for consumers.&#13;
This research employs normative legal research with a descriptiveanalytical&#13;
approach. Primary data sources include DSN-MUI Fatwa No. 144 and&#13;
146/2021, Law No. 8 of 1999 on Consumer Protection, and the ITE Law. Secondary&#13;
data sources encompass fiqh muamalah texts, risk management literature, and&#13;
previous studies. Data analysis was conducted qualitatively using the framework of&#13;
Consumer Protection Theory, Vaughan's Risk Management Theory, and Ma'alat al-&#13;
Af'al Theory as analytical tools.&#13;
Facebook Marketplace does not meet the criteria as an Electronic System&#13;
Trading Operator (Penyelenggara Perdagangan Melalui Sistem&#13;
Elektronik/PPMSE) as stipulated in Government Regulation No. 80 of 2019 and&#13;
Minister of Trade Regulation No. 31 of 2023, thus placing it in a legally ambiguous&#13;
status—functionally conducting e-commerce activities yet administratively not&#13;
subject to the PMSE regulatory regime.&#13;
The findings reveal that out of eight core provisions of the DSN-MUI Fatwa,&#13;
only one is partially fulfilled (ijab-qabul in an electronic assembly), while seven&#13;
other provisions are systematically unfulfilled, including clarity of the transaction&#13;
object, prohibition of tadlis, gharar, ghisy, and najasy, khiyar rights, dispute&#13;
resolution mechanisms, seller verification, and consumer complaints. The DSNMUI&#13;
Fatwa is proven to be methodologically sound ijtihad based on reading the&#13;
ma'alat mafsadah of unstandardized digital transaction practices. However, its&#13;
effectiveness as a risk mitigation instrument remains limited due to three&#13;
fundamental obstacles: the absence of enforcement mechanisms against foreign&#13;
platforms, weak socialization of the fatwa to users, and the dependence of&#13;
implementation on voluntary compliance. Consequently, financial and spiritual&#13;
risks (transactions containing gharar and tadlis) continue to occur without being&#13;
structurally prevented by the fatwa. This research recommends strengthening&#13;
collaboration between DSN-MUI, the government, and platforms to close&#13;
regulatory gaps and enhance sharia literacy among consumers in digital&#13;
transactions.</mods:abstract><mods:classification authority="lcc">297.273 Ekonomi Islam / Fiqih Muamalah</mods:classification><mods:originInfo><mods:dateIssued encoding="iso8061">2026-06-29</mods:dateIssued></mods:originInfo><mods:originInfo><mods:publisher>UIN SUNAN KALIJAGA YOGYAKARTA;FAKULTAS SYARI’AH DAN HUKUM</mods:publisher></mods:originInfo><mods:genre>Thesis</mods:genre></mods:mods>