<didl:DIDL xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:didl="urn:mpeg:mpeg21:2002:02-DIDL-NS" xmlns:dii="urn:mpeg:mpeg21:2002:01-DII-NS" xmlns:dip="urn:mpeg:mpeg21:2002:01-DIP-NS" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" DIDLDocumentId="http://digilib.uin-suka.ac.id/id/eprint/77963" xsi:schemaLocation="urn:mpeg:mpeg21:2002:02-DIDL-NS http://standards.iso.org/ittf/PubliclyAvailableStandards/MPEG-21_schema_files/did/didl.xsd urn:mpeg:mpeg21:2002:01-DII-NS http://standards.iso.org/ittf/PubliclyAvailableStandards/MPEG-21_schema_files/dii/dii.xsd urn:mpeg:mpeg21:2005:01-DIP-NS http://standards.iso.org/ittf/PubliclyAvailableStandards/MPEG-21_schema_files/dip/dip.xsd">
  <didl:Item>
    <didl:Descriptor>
      <didl:Statement mimeType="application/xml">
        <dii:Identifier>http://digilib.uin-suka.ac.id/id/eprint/77963</dii:Identifier>
      </didl:Statement>
    </didl:Descriptor>
    <didl:Descriptor>
      <didl:Statement mimeType="application/xml">
        <dcterms:modified>2026-09-07T07:05:11Z</dcterms:modified>
      </didl:Statement>
    </didl:Descriptor>
    <didl:Component>
      <didl:Resource mimeType="application/xml" ref="https://digilib.uin-suka.ac.id/cgi/export/eprint/77963/DIDL/digilib-eprint-77963.xml"/>
    </didl:Component>
    <didl:Item>
      <didl:Descriptor>
        <didl:Statement mimeType="application/xml">
          <dip:ObjectType>info:eu-repo/semantics/descriptiveMetadata</dip:ObjectType>
        </didl:Statement>
      </didl:Descriptor>
      <didl:Component>
        <didl:Resource mimeType="application/xml">
          <oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
        <dc:relation>https://digilib.uin-suka.ac.id/id/eprint/77963/</dc:relation>
        <dc:title>DISPARITAS PUTUSAN PENGADILAN AGAMA TENTANG PERMOHONAN IZIN POLIGAMI (STUDI PUTUSAN PENGADILAN AGAMA WONOSARI DAN SURABAYA)</dc:title>
        <dc:creator>Nurul Ulfa, NIM.: 22203011059</dc:creator>
        <dc:subject>297.577 Hukum Keluarga Islam, Bimbingan Pernikahan, Poligami, Perceraian, Iddah, Pengasuhan Anak)</dc:subject>
        <dc:description>The research entitled "Disparity of Religious Court Decisions Regarding&#13;
Applications for Polygamy Permits: A Study of Wonosari and Surabaya Religious&#13;
Court Decisions" is motivated by the disparity in the decisions of judges at the&#13;
Wonosari and Surabaya Religious Courts regarding polygamy permits. Judges at&#13;
the Wonosari Religious Court and Judges at the Surabaya Religious Court have&#13;
different opinions in determining polygamy permits. As per Article 4 paragraph&#13;
(2) of the Marriage Law in conjunction with Article 57 of the KHI, there is a&#13;
disparity in understanding and applying the article to the applicant and the&#13;
respondent. in the case at the Wonosari Religious Court in&#13;
No.957/Pdt.G/2018/PA.Wno, and No.1222/Pdt.G/2018/PA/ Wno, and also at the&#13;
Surabaya Religious Court with No.6357/Pdt.G/2021/PA.Sby and&#13;
No.3886/Pdt.G/2021/PA.Sby there was a disparity in the judges' decisions. First&#13;
thing that comes to mind is how the findings and interpretations in the Wonosari&#13;
and Surabaya Religious Courts regarding permit applications with the same&#13;
subject matter resulted in different decisions. And why there is such a disparity in&#13;
decisions regarding polygamy permit applications in the Wonosari and Surabaya&#13;
Religious Courts.&#13;
This research is a library research approach. The data analysis method used&#13;
is qualitative analysis using an inductive and deductive framework, and the data&#13;
collection technique utilizes decisions, books, journals, and previous research.&#13;
The results of the study show that the causes of the disparity in the decisions&#13;
above are due to several things, namely in placing Article 4 paragraph (2) of Law&#13;
Number 1 of 1974 in conjunction with Article 57 of the Compilation of Islamic&#13;
Law, the judges of the Wonosari Religious Court use the article with a limitative&#13;
nature and cannot be expanded, Judges at the Wonosari Religious Court; First, use&#13;
a textual and restrictive interpretation approach. Second, the position of the norm&#13;
is understood in a limitative manner. Third, alternative conditions become the&#13;
main conditions. Fourth, consideration of social facts is not accommodated. Fifth,&#13;
the orientation of the decision is legal certainty. Sixth, using the rule-based&#13;
reasoning method. Seventh, the implications of the decision are consistent but less&#13;
neat, while the Surabaya Religious Court is more progressive with a theological&#13;
approach; First, the theological and contextual approach. Second, the position of&#13;
the norm is interpreted by considering the law, third, alternative conditions can be&#13;
considered together with factual conditions. Fourth, consideration of social facts is&#13;
accommodated as a legal reality. Fifth, the orientation of the decision is&#13;
substantive justice and expediency. Sixth, using case-based reasoning. Seventh,&#13;
the implications of the decision are adaptive. Judges at the Wonosari and&#13;
Surabaya Religious Courts differ in paradigm. The Wonosari Religious Court uses&#13;
a formal-legalistic approach, while the Surabaya Religious Court uses a&#13;
progressive-substantive approach. Furthermore, the Wonosari and Surabaya&#13;
Religious Courts are motivated by different sociological backgrounds.</dc:description>
        <dc:date>2026-08-03</dc:date>
        <dc:type>Thesis</dc:type>
        <dc:type>NonPeerReviewed</dc:type>
        <dc:format>text</dc:format>
        <dc:language>id</dc:language>
        <dc:identifier>https://digilib.uin-suka.ac.id/id/eprint/77963/1/22203011059_BAB-I_IV-atau-V_DAFTAR-PUSTAKA.pdf</dc:identifier>
        <dc:format>text</dc:format>
        <dc:language>id</dc:language>
        <dc:identifier>https://digilib.uin-suka.ac.id/id/eprint/77963/2/22203011059_BAB-II_sampai_SEBELUM-BAB-TERAKHIR.pdf</dc:identifier>
        <dc:identifier>  Nurul Ulfa, NIM.: 22203011059  (2026) DISPARITAS PUTUSAN PENGADILAN AGAMA TENTANG PERMOHONAN IZIN POLIGAMI (STUDI PUTUSAN PENGADILAN AGAMA WONOSARI DAN SURABAYA).  Masters thesis, UIN SUNAN KALIJAGA YOGYAKARTA.   </dc:identifier></oai_dc:dc>
        </didl:Resource>
      </didl:Component>
    </didl:Item>
    <didl:Item>
      <didl:Descriptor>
        <didl:Statement mimeType="application/xml">
          <dip:ObjectType>info:eu-repo/semantics/objectFile</dip:ObjectType>
        </didl:Statement>
      </didl:Descriptor>
      <didl:Component>
        <didl:Resource mimeType="text" ref="https://digilib.uin-suka.ac.id/id/eprint/77963/1/22203011059_BAB-I_IV-atau-V_DAFTAR-PUSTAKA.pdf"/>
      </didl:Component>
    </didl:Item>
    <didl:Item>
      <didl:Descriptor>
        <didl:Statement mimeType="application/xml">
          <dip:ObjectType>info:eu-repo/semantics/objectFile</dip:ObjectType>
        </didl:Statement>
      </didl:Descriptor>
      <didl:Component>
        <didl:Resource mimeType="text" ref="https://digilib.uin-suka.ac.id/id/eprint/77963/2/22203011059_BAB-II_sampai_SEBELUM-BAB-TERAKHIR.pdf"/>
      </didl:Component>
    </didl:Item>
    <didl:Item>
      <didl:Descriptor>
        <didl:Statement mimeType="application/xml">
          <dip:ObjectType>info:eu-repo/semantics/humanStartPage</dip:ObjectType>
        </didl:Statement>
      </didl:Descriptor>
      <didl:Component>
        <didl:Resource mimeType="application/html" ref="https://digilib.uin-suka.ac.id/id/eprint/77963/"/>
      </didl:Component>
    </didl:Item>
  </didl:Item>
</didl:DIDL>