%0 Thesis
%9 Masters
%A Muhammad Gofur, NIM.: 24202011022
%B FAKULTAS DAKWAH DAN KOMUNIKASI
%D 2026
%F digilib:78054
%I UIN SUNAN KALIJAGA YOGYAKARTA
%K Analisis Framing, Kuota Haji, Kompas.com, Republika.co.id, Orientasi  Redaksional, Zhongdang Pan & Gerald M. Kosicki
%P 219
%T FRAMING PEMBERITAAN DUGAAN PENYALAHGUNAAN KUOTA HAJI PADA MEDIA KOMPAS.COM DAN REPUBLIKA.CO.ID PERIODE 2024 – 2026
%U https://digilib.uin-suka.ac.id/id/eprint/78054/
%X The issuance of the Decree of the Minister of Religious Affairs (KMA) Number  130 of 2024 concerning the allocation of additional Hajj quotas triggered legal and  public controversies regarding alleged abuse of authority and potential state losses  investigated by the Special Committee for the Right of Inquiry of the House of  Representatives (Pansus Hak Angket DPR RI) and the Corruption Eradication  Commission (KPK). This politico-legal event was captured by the digital press and  constructed into public discourse. This study aims to analyze the news framing of  alleged Hajj quota abuse on the online news portals Kompas.com and Republika.co.id,  as well as to uncover indications of editorial orientation manifested in the text through  four discourse structural dimensions (syntax, script, thematic, and rhetorical).  This study employs a constructivist paradigm with a descriptive-comparative  qualitative approach based on Zhongdang Pan and Gerald M. Kosicki’s framing  analysis model. The subjects of the research consist of the news media Kompas.com  and Republika.co.id, while the object of study is the framing discourse surrounding the  alleged abuse of Hajj quotas. Sampling was conducted using a purposive sampling  technique based on event matching, which yielded a final corpus of 10 complete news  articles tied into 5 key event pairs. Data trustworthiness was established through the  construction of an audit trail, coding consistency checks, peer debriefing, and negative  case analysis.  The findings demonstrate that both Kompas.com and Republika.co.id  primarily frame the alleged Hajj quota abuse as an issue of law, governance, and  public accountability, relying heavily on official sources (KPK and the DPR Special  Committee) and placing investigative developments at the core of their coverage. The  framing differences between the two outlets are gradual rather than forming an  absolute dichotomy. Kompas.com tends to more directly emphasize alleged violations,  state financial losses, and law enforcement actions. Conversely, Republika.co.id tends  to be more contextual, clarifying, and legally cautious by providing proportional space  for clarifications and the perspectives of relevant stakeholders.  The selection of news sources, angles, and information structuring across  syntactic, script, thematic, and rhetorical dimensions reflects indications of differing  editorial orientations between the two media outlets. Because this study focuses  exclusively on news text analysis without incorporating newsroom interviews or  internal policy documents, these findings are understood as textual indications of  editorial orientation rather than direct proof of formal newsroom policy. The  implications of this framing on public perception remain potential and warrant  dedicated audience reception research.
%Z Dr. Hamdan Daulay, M.Si., M.A.