EVALUASI PENGELOLAAN LABORATORIUM FISIKA PADA SEKOLAH MADRASAH ALIYAH NEGERI (MAN) DI SLEMANNIM.: 22104050030Dwi NurlitasariauthorPhysics laboratories require planned, organized, implemented, monitored, and evaluated management to support effective learning. This study aims to evaluate physics laboratory management in three State Islamic Senior High Schools (MAN) in Sleman in terms of planning, organizing, implementation, and monitoring and evaluation. It also describes laboratory facilities and infrastructure using the detailed indicators in the observation instrumen applied during field data collection. The facilities instrumen was developed with reference to the former Regulation of the Minister of National Education No. 24 of 2007. In the discussion, results from that legacy instrumen are interpreted proportionally within the current regulatory context, namely Regulation of the Minister of Education, Culture, Research, and Technology No. 22 of 2023 for facilities and infrastructure and Regulation of the Minister of Primary and Secondary Education No. 26 of 2025 for education-unit management standards. The study used a descriptive-evaluative design with a qualitative approach. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews with laboratory heads, physics teachers, and laboratory personnel, direct observation, and documentation. The main analysis followed the Miles and Huberman model of data collection, data reduction, data display, and conclusion drawing or verification. Percentages from the observation checklist were used only as supporting descriptive summaries of facility-indicator fulfillment, not as inferential statistical analysis. Data credibility was strengthened through source and technique triangulation by comparing evidence concerning the same indicators across interviews, observations, and documents. The findings show that all three madrasahs implemented the main laboratory management functions, but differed in implementation consistency, administrative evidence, human resources, and facility conditions. MAN 2 Sleman faced constraints in budget, laboratory personnel, equipment availability, and written monitoring and evaluation. MAN 3 Sleman showed relatively strong planning, laboratory use, and equipment availability, while limitations remained in room size and supporting spaces. MAN 5 Sleman had relatively regular monitoring and reporting, but lacked laboratory personnel and used the laboratory jointly for science subjects. Based on the detailed instrumen derived from the former 2007 regulation, facility-indicator fulfillment was 65% at MAN 2, 95% at MAN 3, and 87% at MAN 5. These percentages refer to the legacy instrumen and are not presented as compliance rates with the 2023 regulation. The evaluation supports school-specific improvements in laboratory personnel, maintenance, evaluation documentation, and facilities according to learning needs.530.7 Pendidikan Fisika2026-08-19UIN SUNAN KALIJAGA YOGYAKARTA;FAKULTAS ILMU TARBIYAH DAN KEGURUANThesis