Institutional Repository UIN Sunan Kalijaga YogyakartaSTRATEGI PENANGANAN OPM PEMERINTAH REPUBLIK INDONESIANIM.: 24203011095Rahayu Fauzi Jaya, S.SosauthorThis research examines the effectiveness of the Indonesian government's hard power and soft power approaches in addressing the Free Papua Organisation (OPM), officially designated as an Armed Criminal Group (KKB). The Papuan conflict constitutes a multidimensional issue encompassing national security, political legitimacy, structural injustice, and the right to self-determination of indigenous Papuan communities. The designation of OPM as a KKB in 2021 and the discourse on categorising it as a terrorist organisation under Law Number 5 of 2018 have generated normative controversy, as these measures are regarded as erasing the political context of the Papuan movement rooted in structural injustice since the Act of Free Choice (Pepera) of 1969. This research employs a normative-empirical juridical approach integrating statute, conceptual, historical, and theological normative perspectives. The analysis rests upon two theoretical frameworks: Ted Robert Gurr's theory of relative deprivation explaining collective violence as a product of the gap between value expectations and value capabilities through the frustration-aggressionrebellion mechanism; and Al-Māwardī's concept of bughat in al-Aḥkām al- Sulṭāniyyah, which mandates that the state pursue al-munasahah (dialogue) before resorting to al-qitāl (military force). This research further proposes a new theory named Dual Reasons Theory (DRT) as an original synthesis addressing the third research question. The The findings reveal: (1) the hard power approach has produced more than 105,878 internally displaced persons by 2026 and deepened cycles of violence without resolving the structural roots of the conflict, the terrorist designation is assessed as normatively inappropriate as it forecloses dignified dialogue, (2) the OPM movement satisfies all four criteria for bughat under Al- Māwardī syawka, defiance of legitimate authority, use of armed force, and ideological ta'wīl yet the normative sequence of al-munasahah has not been consistently observed, (3) Dual Reasons Theory posits that the Papuan conflict persists due to two simultaneous reasons: Reason I – Structural Deprivation (accumulated multidimensional relative deprivation left unaddressed) and Reason II – Normative Misrecognition (the state's failure to recognise OPM's political dimension and fulfil its obligation of al-munasahah). Any approach targeting only one reason is inherently partial and unsustainable. The research recommends a paradigm shift toward proactive humanitarian approaches; revitalisation of dignified dialogue involving indigenous Papuan leaders; structural reform of Special Autonomy for Papua; and the establishment of an independent truth and reconciliation commission.341.6 Hukum Perang / Konflik Bersenjata2026-07-22UIN SUNAN KALIJAGA YOGYAKARTA;FAKULTAS SYARIAH DAN HUKUMThesis

For work being deposited by its own author: In self-archiving this collection of files and associated bibliographic metadata, I grant Institutional Repository UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta the right to store them and to make them permanently available publicly for free on-line. I declare that this material is my own intellectual property and I understand that Institutional Repository UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta does not assume any responsibility if there is any breach of copyright in distributing these files or metadata. (All authors are urged to prominently assert their copyright on the title page of their work.)

For work being deposited by someone other than its author: I hereby declare that the collection of files and associated bibliographic metadata that I am archiving at Institutional Repository UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta) is in the public domain. If this is not the case, I accept full responsibility for any breach of copyright that distributing these files or metadata may entail.

Clicking on the deposit button indicates your agreement to these terms.