{
      "department": "FAKULTAS SYARIAH DAN HUKUM",
      "subjects": [
        347.07
      ],
      "eprintid": 78858,
      "thesis_type": "skripsi",
      "date": "2026-08-14",
      "userid": 12460,
      "documents": [
          {
            "language": "id",
            "placement": 1,
            "eprintid": 78858,
            "files": [
                {
                  "hash_type": "MD5",
                  "mtime": "2026-10-08 02:13:48",
                  "datasetid": "document",
                  "fileid": 1877914,
                  "objectid": 1080639,
                  "uri": "http:\/\/digilib.uin-suka.ac.id\/id\/file\/1877914",
                  "mime_type": "application\/pdf",
                  "hash": "4a3a813327ae4aa08f84c5643f72d730",
                  "filesize": 8475529,
                  "filename": "22103040189_BAB-I_IV-atau-V_DAFTAR-PUSTAKA.pdf"
                }
            ],
            "content": "published",
            "rev_number": 3,
            "uri": "http:\/\/digilib.uin-suka.ac.id\/id\/document\/1080639",
            "main": "22103040189_BAB-I_IV-atau-V_DAFTAR-PUSTAKA.pdf",
            "mime_type": "application\/pdf",
            "docid": 1080639,
            "format": "text",
            "security": "public",
            "pos": 1,
            "formatdesc": "PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM DALAM PENOLAKAN PUTUSAN SERTA MERTA (UITVOERBAAR BIJ VOORRAAD) TERHADAP PEMENUHAN HAK PEKERJA (STUDI PUTUSAN NOMOR 4\/PDT.SUS-PHI\/2024\/PN YYK)"
          },
          {
            "language": "id",
            "placement": 2,
            "eprintid": 78858,
            "files": [
                {
                  "hash_type": "MD5",
                  "mtime": "2026-10-08 02:13:50",
                  "datasetid": "document",
                  "fileid": 1877917,
                  "objectid": 1080640,
                  "uri": "http:\/\/digilib.uin-suka.ac.id\/id\/file\/1877917",
                  "mime_type": "application\/pdf",
                  "hash": "55fa9af12d5dc7114d6183ff6365e191",
                  "filesize": 8816876,
                  "filename": "22103040189_BAB-II_sampai_SEBELUM-BAB-TERAKHIR.pdf"
                }
            ],
            "content": "published",
            "rev_number": 3,
            "uri": "http:\/\/digilib.uin-suka.ac.id\/id\/document\/1080640",
            "main": "22103040189_BAB-II_sampai_SEBELUM-BAB-TERAKHIR.pdf",
            "mime_type": "application\/pdf",
            "docid": 1080640,
            "format": "text",
            "security": "validuser",
            "pos": 2,
            "formatdesc": "PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM DALAM PENOLAKAN PUTUSAN SERTA MERTA (UITVOERBAAR BIJ VOORRAAD) TERHADAP PEMENUHAN HAK PEKERJA (STUDI PUTUSAN NOMOR 4\/PDT.SUS-PHI\/2024\/PN YYK)"
          }
      ],
      "rev_number": 12,
      "creators": [
        {
          "name": {
            "lineage": null,
            "given": "NIM.: 22103040189",
            "honourific": null,
            "family": "Muhammad Nabil Fadhlurahman"
          }
        }
      ],
      "dir": "disk0\/00\/07\/88\/58",
      "keywords": "Pertimbangan Hakim, Putusan Serta-Merta, Uitvoerbaar Bij Voorraad;\r\nHak Pekerja, Perlindungan Hukum",
      "lastmod": "2026-10-08 02:19:00",
      "ispublished": "pub",
      "metadata_visibility": "show",
      "date_type": "published",
      "eprint_status": "archive",
      "status_changed": "2026-10-08 02:19:00",
      "datestamp": "2026-10-08 02:19:00",
      "uri": "http:\/\/digilib.uin-suka.ac.id\/id\/eprint\/78858",
      "thesis_name": "other",
      "note": "Dr. Misbahul Mujib, S.Ag., M.Hum.",
      "full_text_status": "restricted",
      "contact_email": "muh.khabib@uin-suka.ac.id",
      "divisions": [
        "il_hum"
      ],
      "abstract": "Industrial relations frequently give rise to disputes concerning the fulfillment of\r\nworkers' rights, particularly following the termination of employment. One legal\r\nmechanism intended to provide immediate protection is the provisionally\r\nenforceable judgment (uitvoerbaar bij voorraad). However, in practice, requests for\r\nsuch judgments are not always granted. This study examines the judges' legal\r\nconsiderations in rejecting a request for a provisionally enforceable judgment in\r\nDecision Number 4\/Pdt.Sus-PHI\/2024\/PN Yyk and analyzes its implications for the\r\nfulfillment of workers' rights by applying Gustav Radbruch's theory of justice and\r\nPhilipus M. Hadjon's theory of legal protection.\r\nThis research employs an empirical legal research method with an empirical\r\njuridical approach. Primary data were collected through interviews with judges of\r\nthe Industrial Relations Court at the Yogyakarta District Court, while secondary\r\ndata were obtained from statutory regulations, court decisions, books, and scholarly\r\njournals. The collected data were analyzed descriptively using a qualitative\r\napproach and inductive reasoning.\r\nThe findings reveal that the rejection of the request for a provisionally\r\nenforceable judgment was based on considerations of legal certainty, judicial\r\nprudence, and the failure to satisfy the requirements set forth in Article 180 of the\r\nHerziene Indonesisch Reglement (HIR), Supreme Court Circular Letter (SEMA)\r\nNumber 3 of 2000, and SEMA Number 4 of 2001. These considerations reflect the\r\njudges' effort to balance justice, expediency, and legal certainty. Nevertheless, the\r\nrejection delayed the execution of the judgment and the fulfillment of workers'\r\nstatutory rights, thereby reducing the effectiveness of legal protection, as rights\r\nrecognized by the court could not be immediately enforced.",
      "type": "thesis",
      "title": "PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM DALAM PENOLAKAN PUTUSAN SERTA MERTA (UITVOERBAAR BIJ VOORRAAD) TERHADAP PEMENUHAN HAK PEKERJA (STUDI PUTUSAN NOMOR 4\/PDT.SUS-PHI\/2024\/PN YYK)",
      "institution": "UIN SUNAN KALIJAGA YOGYAKARTA",
      "pages": 99
    }