Institutional Repository UIN Sunan Kalijaga YogyakartaHUKUM TASWIR ANIMASI DAN ANIMASI A.I (ANALISIS KOMPARATIF FATWA AL-LAJNAH AD-DAIMAH NO. 2036 DAN FATWA MAJLIS AL-IFTA AL-ALA AL-FILASTINI NO. 724)NIM.: 22103060009Muhammad Raimadoya Juang GiefaryauthorTaṣwīr is one of the issues in Islamic law concerning the depiction of living beings and remains a subject of differing opinions among Islamic scholars. The development of visual technology has resulted in various new forms of representation, including animation and animation generated through Artificial Intelligence (A.I.) technology. This development raises questions regarding the legal status of Taṣwīr in animation and A.I.-generated animation from the perspective of Islamic law. This study examines the legal status of Taṣwīr in animation and A.I.-generated animation and compares it with Fatwa Al-Lajnah Ad- Dā’imah No. 2036 and Fatwa Majlis Al-Iftā’ Al-A‘lā Al-Filasṭīnī No. 724 in determining their legal foundations and status. This research is a normative legal study employing a descriptive-analyticalcomparative method with a normative approach. The primary sources of this research are Fatwa Al-Lajnah Ad-Dā’imah No. 2036 and Fatwa Majlis Al-Iftā’ Al- A‘lā Al-Filasṭīnī No. 724, while the secondary sources consist of works on uṣūl alfiqh, books, journals, and other relevant literature. Data were collected through documentation and analyzed qualitatively. The analysis employs the theories of Sadd Aż-Żarī‘ah, Fatḥ Aż-Żarī‘ah, and comparative law to examine the legal considerations and differences in the construction of legal rulings concerning Taṣwīr in animation and A.I.-generated animation. The results of the study show that Taṣwīr in the form of animation and A.I.- based animation is conditionally permissible, depending on its purpose, manner of use, and consequences. Its use that leads to maṣlaḥah and does not contradict Islamic law falls within the scope of Fatḥ Aż-Żarī‘ah, while its use that leads to mafsadah falls within the scope of Sadd Aż-Żarī‘ah. The comparative analysis shows differences between the two fatwas. Al-Lajnah Ad-Dā’imah establishes the prohibition of Taṣwīr of living beings, whereas Majlis Al-Iftā’ Al-A‘lā Al-Filasṭīnī permits animation subject to certain conditions. This research shares common ground with the approach of Majlis Al-Iftā’ Al-A‘lā Al-Filasṭīnī in providing room for the permissibility of animation; however, such permissibility is understood conditionally based on its purpose, use, and consequences. Furthermore, A.I. technology itself does not constitute an independent determining factor in the legal ruling; rather, its legal status is determined by the purpose and consequences of its use.340.2 Hukum Perbandingan2026-08-18UIN SUNAN KALIJAGA YOGYAKARTA;FAKULTAS SYARIAH DAN HUKUMThesis

For work being deposited by its own author: In self-archiving this collection of files and associated bibliographic metadata, I grant Institutional Repository UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta the right to store them and to make them permanently available publicly for free on-line. I declare that this material is my own intellectual property and I understand that Institutional Repository UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta does not assume any responsibility if there is any breach of copyright in distributing these files or metadata. (All authors are urged to prominently assert their copyright on the title page of their work.)

For work being deposited by someone other than its author: I hereby declare that the collection of files and associated bibliographic metadata that I am archiving at Institutional Repository UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta) is in the public domain. If this is not the case, I accept full responsibility for any breach of copyright that distributing these files or metadata may entail.

Clicking on the deposit button indicates your agreement to these terms.