TY  - THES
N1  - Nurdhin Baroroh, S.H.I, M.S.I.
ID  - digilib78892
UR  - https://digilib.uin-suka.ac.id/id/eprint/78892/
A1  - Muhammad Raimadoya Juang Giefary, NIM.: 22103060009
Y1  - 2026/08/18/
N2  - Ta?w?r is one of the issues in Islamic law concerning the depiction of living
beings and remains a subject of differing opinions among Islamic scholars. The
development of visual technology has resulted in various new forms of
representation, including animation and animation generated through Artificial
Intelligence (A.I.) technology. This development raises questions regarding the
legal status of Ta?w?r in animation and A.I.-generated animation from the
perspective of Islamic law. This study examines the legal status of Ta?w?r in
animation and A.I.-generated animation and compares it with Fatwa Al-Lajnah Ad-
D??imah No. 2036 and Fatwa Majlis Al-Ift?? Al-A?l? Al-Filas??n? No. 724 in
determining their legal foundations and status.
This research is a normative legal study employing a descriptive-analyticalcomparative
method with a normative approach. The primary sources of this
research are Fatwa Al-Lajnah Ad-D??imah No. 2036 and Fatwa Majlis Al-Ift?? Al-
A?l? Al-Filas??n? No. 724, while the secondary sources consist of works on u??l alfiqh,
books, journals, and other relevant literature. Data were collected through
documentation and analyzed qualitatively. The analysis employs the theories of
Sadd A?-?ar??ah, Fat? A?-?ar??ah, and comparative law to examine the legal
considerations and differences in the construction of legal rulings concerning
Ta?w?r in animation and A.I.-generated animation.
The results of the study show that Ta?w?r in the form of animation and A.I.-
based animation is conditionally permissible, depending on its purpose, manner of
use, and consequences. Its use that leads to ma?la?ah and does not contradict
Islamic law falls within the scope of Fat? A?-?ar??ah, while its use that leads to
mafsadah falls within the scope of Sadd A?-?ar??ah. The comparative analysis
shows differences between the two fatwas. Al-Lajnah Ad-D??imah establishes the
prohibition of Ta?w?r of living beings, whereas Majlis Al-Ift?? Al-A?l? Al-Filas??n?
permits animation subject to certain conditions. This research shares common
ground with the approach of Majlis Al-Ift?? Al-A?l? Al-Filas??n? in providing room
for the permissibility of animation; however, such permissibility is understood
conditionally based on its purpose, use, and consequences. Furthermore, A.I.
technology itself does not constitute an independent determining factor in the legal
ruling; rather, its legal status is determined by the purpose and consequences of its
use.
PB  - UIN SUNAN KALIJAGA YOGYAKARTA
KW  - Ta?wir
KW  -  Animasi
KW  -  A.I
M1  - skripsi
TI  - HUKUM TASWIR ANIMASI DAN ANIMASI A.I (ANALISIS KOMPARATIF FATWA AL-LAJNAH AD-DAIMAH NO. 2036 DAN FATWA MAJLIS AL-IFTA AL-ALA AL-FILASTINI NO. 724)
AV  - restricted
EP  - 114
ER  -